They really think we’re all idiots & the state is our babysitter
Yes it’s real, not AI.
She’s Australia’s eSafety commissioner.
Login to reply
Replies (45)
Has this woman SEEN THE INTERNET??? 🤣
Am I the only one hearing her soul cry behind the fake smile and make up? 😬
🤦♂️
I don’t know if she has a soul.
Headshot ☠️
CIA plant.
UnitedNonCompliance
Being kind online means not infringing on innate rights.
And yet what are people doing about it? Nothing, that's what.
Well, yeah...
Soul? Brain.
I'm sure every Young person banned from predatory social media platforms is wondering why this deluded grownup thinks she is inmune to their tactics. Go after bad actors, minister, then let's talk about respect.
Those who trade liberty for safety get neither. 🫡🙌
Lol We just want to make sure you don't meet strange men on the internet who might radicalise you against us
She reminds me of Dolores Umbridge in Harry Potter movies.
Unimpeded conversations online are exactly what's needed to get more people to organise against these tyrants.
A. Why is she American if she's Australia's esafety commissioner?
B. Are there people out there who watch this and think "great message I'm so grateful, happy online safety day!"?
This is why we #nostr #tor #ivpn #graphenos #SimpleX #start9 and they can do what they want to. I'm nice like that
Hahaha Happy safer internet day.
View quoted note →
Did not listen to it as I see a face that 100 % needs to be hit with an iron pan before her vocal diarrhea could reach my ears. 🍳
What about a giant *fuck off, mate*, with a beautiful thick aussie accent?
Lol
Clown world
Lol
Done! ✅
It'a shame we upstanding slaves could never condone using AI to alter this clip in an unsafe way.
she should go fuck herself .. thats it
Obsolete of what really is at play, like most of these 🐑 following the big bad wolfs into darkness convinced by narratives full of lies
The paradox is that she probably believes she’s doing the right thing.
I guess this all boils down to: who is better at creating or enforcing regulations — the state or the free market?
The difference is that free market regulation has competition, the regulations will better reflect reality, whereas the state will manipulate regulations for self-interest. It is a monopoly and must stop creative destruction or die, which means it must control the source of creative destruction: future minds.
State-sanctioned: birth, air, water, food, information, knowledge, freedoms, assisted death.
The state controls our inputs in an attempt to control our outputs.
But as long as inflation exists, the state will have relevance.
Government: “Look how terrible the world is — we must exist for your protection.”
Free market: “Look how terrible the world is — let’s try to build endless solutions and let you choose what works.”
One is centralising; the other is decentralising.
One must reduce agency; the other increases agency.
Once inflation is corrected for, this becomes purely a battle of good vs. evil.
free markets DO NOT EXIST ANYMORE since nearly 60years
Can a business the come to big to fail?
Can a business be "structurally important"?
Do monopolies currently exist?
Results of central banking.
the eSafety commissioner is worried about AI deepfakes, not the deepfakes they're already selling us. the state as babysitter? more like the state as art critic, deciding what's "safe" to look at.
B. The sad part is it's probably more people nodding in agreement than not
The irony is obvious:
What’s sold as “safety” for younger users has far less to do with protection and far more to do with conditioning.
This is about shaping acceptable language.
Reinforcing approved narratives.
And training people—early—to outsource judgment to authority.
That isn’t safety. That’s indoctrination.
The architects of centralized moderation don’t trust citizens to think, choose, or disagree.
They believe control of speech is control of minds—and history shows they’re right to believe that.
That’s exactly why the founders of the United States enshrined freedom of speech:
not because speech is harmless,
but because power cannot be trusted to decide truth.
Decentralized systems matter because they remove the babysitter.
They force responsibility back onto individuals—where it belongs.
Free speech was never meant to be safe.
It was meant to be free from governors of thought.
Save = CHAIN
Clowns all around.
View quoted note →
The state positioning itself as your protector while simultaneously being the biggest threat to your freedom is the oldest trick in the book. They don't want you safe - they want you dependent. Bitcoin is exit. ⚡satmax@
Primal
Live Free
American accent huh
Who is paying her, Efrat? People need to start following the money and expose these clowns.
Puppets. 
Isnt this a good thing ? ... this is how people ditch the platforms to set up their own relays and blossoms and clients and npubs and nsecs ..
I have no idea why nostriches want to help platforms 😭😭😭
All I heard was Happy go Fock your freedom day ….is that what she really said or did I misheard that?
Sadly, she is head of the Ministry of Useful Idiots. I was going to modify that with "unwitting" but I cannot defend the indefensible.