no way that was a hack
Login to reply
Replies (39)
Technological challenges, IMO
View quoted note →
Not a chance. Seems like someone screwed up a scheduled tweet…
If the ETF's get delayed because of this then it was no "accident" imo. If they are approved tomorrow as expected then maybe I could by a staffer error. I agree it wasn't a hack. To me it is an accident vs an inside job.
People claiming hacked accounts to avoid responsibility for their tweets is similar to "my dog ate my homework" in current times lol. seen so many politicians do this. need better excuses.
💯🎯🙌
Not even a question
View quoted note →
No way jośe
Compromised not hacked. Words matter.
no way that was a compromised
Elon did it! 🤣
It’s just all show and entertainment in this Clown world 🤡😄 
That’s what I’ve been saying.
I thought it was a fat finger too, till I saw this 😂
Yeah maybe it was a hack 
likely a scheduled tweet set to the wrong day
inside job 4 sure
#nostr fixes this. CNBC is now saying it was a twitter hack at twitter. Not an SEC hack or account breach.
SEC forgot to update their scheduled posts
Seems very very unlikely…
SEC is gonna make BTC safe for retail!
😆
🤡🌏
Seems to me like it was a mis scheduled post or something internal
they be like… 
maybe the goal of this “hack” was to try to drive down the price, keep prices low(er), and avoid a fomo pump when the “real” announcement is made now that new money will second guess any future announcements…
or they’re just incompetent…
scratch that…this is the SEC and Gary we’re talking about…they’re definitely just that incompetent.
nope.
View quoted note →
I've been saying that that was the tweet in draft that got posted early. it was worded too well for a 'compromise'
fat fingers or psyop?
Why?
@jack how long would the account recovery normally take?
Suss af the post was left up for 20 mins. They regained account control in 20 mins? BS
lulz
Whoa!!! 🤯
Just a dry run and market manipulation by the government and SEC to see what would happen if they do approve it
You was right again 💪🏽
@Edward Snowden 😂🫂💜
Ditto
Agree
Apparently it was:
"We can confirm that the account @SECGov was compromised and we have completed a preliminary investigation. Based on our investigation, the compromise was not due to any breach of X’s systems, but rather due to an unidentified individual obtaining control over a phone number associated with the @SECGov account through a third party," said X Safety.
"We can also confirm that the account did not have two-factor authentication enabled at the time the account was compromised. We encourage all users to enable this extra layer of security. More information and tips on how to keep your account secure can be found in our Help Center."
they couldn't have made more of a hash of this approval if they tried...
That's exactly what I was thinking!
View quoted note →