#monero fixes this. No more deciding whether to run a LN node at a loss or succumb to just using custodial solutions. Context. I use coinos, embedded Zeus node, monero and onchain bitcoins. Just all for different things. For online payments or dark net shit, monero is the winner right now by a long shot. #statistics
djmeistro✝️ 🍊💊⚡️'s avatar djmeistro✝️ 🍊💊⚡️
View quoted note →

Replies (31)

all direct exchanges trend towards the value of the USD price comparison obviously any fluctuation away from those prices is an arbitrage opportunity this is BECAUSE the USD is the underlying UoA
because smart Bitconers should understand Unit of Account. and its absurd you double down on the retarded "the UoA can be anything" viewpoint
those prices are *denominated* in USD and unfortunately dividing them doesn't change that fact, it gives the ratio of the USD prices. there are no Bitcoin denominated charts under a fiat UoA.
Default avatar
twofish 11 months ago
This sounds like a UTC vs EST argument, and people are arguing about what time it is. Tied with the law of motion.
.'s avatar
. 11 months ago
I have seen you make this point before and it shows just how difficult it is to see outside of the dollar. This is a poignant insight.
.'s avatar
. 11 months ago
Do you see some usefulness in saying so many monero is equal to so many Bitcoin and leave dollars out of it. That as a community of users we just agree on a forever monero to bitcoin peg and wrap our brains around creating an economy in that paradigm. Just spit ballin.
I don't think it has to be anything except a voluntary exchange rate for whatever the asset is. But basically yeah the best (only?) way to bootstrap of new UoA is to just start disintermediating the old one with p2p exchange. small communities trading vfv amongst themselves at first bitcoin for beef has become the classic example. more of that.
Monero losing value to Bitcoin is a red herring. If you're a cypher punk, then you're not worried about an increase in value, but an increase in utility. However, I see your point as losing money was mentioned. To that, I would just say, don't hold all your money in monero. Unfortunately LN is really hard to attack because there are so many edge cases. Which version do I attack without making a straw man? The custodial WoS? The difficulties of running a node? The failed payments? The FC in high fee environment? No matter what one argues, you or Darth or some other dev who bleeds code will argue that aCtUAlly LN is really easy and suuperr private. But I reject that. I would say it CAN be private. But it's not a default state. LN is a network, and just like governments running Tor exit nodes, an attack on LN could be hidden. What IF a country was snooping the data or observing it? I'm not saying that's happening, but can a user who ONLY wants privacy but doesn't understand LN guarantee to themselves that they have 100% privacy all the time?
Enjoy being poor? Early bitcoiners used Bitcoin for ideological reasons. Not to get rich. You're pathetic. Conversely "shitcoiners" don't like Bitcoin because they feel there are other horses to hitch their wagons to to get rich. And it's fair to point out to that person that they're gambling and probably going to lose money. I see monero as more of a resurgence of the original vibes of Bitcoin. And unfortunately those that use it are more ideologically bitcoiners than the ETF, KYC, Michael Saylor crowd.
Default avatar
npub1ah3a...l76e 11 months ago
XMR vs BTC would also be disrupted on a Bitcoin or as a thinking exercise Monero UoA standard.
Default avatar
npub1ah3a...l76e 11 months ago
Maxis can not comprehend (yet) that SoV and MoE are minor achievements over unit of account. If UoA changes, the whole value system changes. People will totally look at all things differently. SoV (easy to achieve) and MoE (much harder to achieve) are mere prerequisites for a unit of account.