PSA: Probably going to disable LNURL messages below 100 sat payments in LN.tips - the spam has been going wild in recent days. Get rekt spammers.

Replies (34)

Noticed this too. Never thought I’d be annoyed getting free sats. lol
Imagine the news articles in 30 years from now about spammers paying 1 dollar per message
Yeah, 100 sats limit sounds good to me. Let's try that and then we'll see how that goes.
If there's one thing to learn on the web is that internet will always find a way to do what it wants. If people want to spam or do ads, I prefer getting paid for than for free. I receive more spam emails that pay me nothing to ignore them than ln ads. Although would be nice to have a config to put a price on my attention (like receive ads only for 21 SATs or more)
unknown's avatar
unknown 2 years ago
I’m here for the free sats. πŸ˜†
Spammers feel free to zap me thousands of 1 sat zapvertisements. I will ignore every one, and simply stack.
Wait, How do I sign up for zap spam? This seems like a good problem to have! πŸ˜…
not only that, what if i could customise the amount of sats that somebody can zap my note with, when they want to include an additional and/or what if there was a verification process for this? let’s say somebody zapped above my designated limit and linked something gore etc. that i wouldn’t want to be associated with my note
LN.tips now requires payments to be at least 21 sats to send you an message. If the message includes a URL, that minimum goes up to 100 sats. If you're going to get spammed, you should be able to stack some sats 🫰 To receive more spam, put your ln.tips Lightning address into your nostr profile. View quoted note β†’
If I would have been paid 1sat for every Spam E-Mail I received I would be rich now. I don't care about 1sat Spam Transactions. Just ignore them.
YES! Thats the reason it suddenly changed from 1-2 sats to 21 sats for spam. stack spam, stack sats
Yes, we need to add filtering to the transaction list. Already you can set a minimum transaction amount to be notified of via email
↑