"Post labor economics" Im gonna sit down for this one lol

For real, I got 30 seconds in and had to pause to comment on that

HORRIFYING Mentality

It gets so much worse 😭 dude invokes the IMF and WEF when describing his economic opinions. The worst part is that he seems to be mostly correct

Oh good, hes been "investing in things like blockchain" in relation to UBI 😂

Cringe and inaccurate

Ehhh... I distinctly recall a Dave Shapiro vid from like a year ago where he was like 'pack it up, AGI is here, kick back and enjoy'... And he was talking about gpt 4o. Felt so off to me at the time. Since then I've been trying to place where exactly his useful perspectives are, versus his... Idk overexcitement. I am very thankful someone is raising the broad consciousness about how economics and ownership models will have to change, and if we don't do it intentionally, we'll prob default to UBI (which I find unhealthy). Regardless, I do agree that the latest batch of models is a tipping point. Gemini 2.5 Pro, o3/o4 mini. Coding was already fun with the last batch, but now it's like... freaky fast, it can infer so much intent, and is much more self-correcting

Had to take a break from him a few months ago when he kept saying he unironically thinks Claude is conscious

Hey Jack, is this decentralized? Do I have to prove people that it’s Cobie fr?

Interesting

scary stuff 🫥😐🫤😑😶🥲

He talks a lot about the labor market vanishing and economy collapsing because people will have no money to spend. In that context, the implied solution is to get to a point where you earn your money from property, physical or intellectual or else you're fucked. What I don't get is who will pay you your fees/rent/buy property if nobody has money to spend? Whether you are offering a service by selling your time or some property for rent, you compete in the same market for the same amount of money available in it. What decides whether you will earn is the value of your offering for people, not the type of offering. In my view the safest way to ensure wellbeing is to be able to produce what you need and know people who you can trade with for the stuff you can't produce yourself.

Urgent ❤️‍🩹 #startsmall Hello @jack sir, I am Sid, a gold artist. I need your Help Please 🙏 I kindly request your few minutes please on my Primal Note on my profile 🙏 It’s genuinely an emergency for us, From my Job, to my family, our house & endless Medical bills❤️‍🩹 I can share any proof to verify everything, But please save me & my family, please 🙏 Thank you 🙏

Sid

Hello @jack Sir,
Sid Soni here from india. 

I need your Help, Please save us 🙏

I’ll try to keep this as short as possib...

"Labor Market vanishing" sure but guess what, there will always be jobs.. in the virtual world.. virtual world.. virtual world.. because who is going to blacksmith my MASTER SWORD HUH?!?! Did you think about THAT?!

Embrace Your manhood, wholly!Accept that You are loved!

Blonde temptation

Right, these apocalyptic views are mostly rubbish IMHO. The flip side of "everyone loses their job" is that "everything craters in price." You can't have one without the other. And if the latter happens, then you don't need a job, because things approach "free" in cost. I think what's going to happen is the same thing that has always happened with automation: some things get cheaper, this opens more doors for entrepreneurship, productive gets more efficient, everyone is better off.... rinse lather repeat.

Christos Anesti!

Jack:oh..Christ looks just like me,,I will follow him..

Jack:Follow me....

I've been using o3 for a complex surgical and unfortunately it still hallucinates a ton. It fully fabricated a couple of citations. Would recommend using 'Deep Research' for investigating a topic, and then o3 for contextual reasoning about the results of that investigation. npub1fls5au5fxj6qj0t36sage857cs4tgfpla0ll8prshlhstagejtkqc9s2ylView quoted note →

C’ est vrai que gpt c’est une grosse bibliothèque online et les gens peuvent se formé et acquérir plus des connaissances si l’ utilisent bien, ils donne pas des nouvelles idées, il récapitule les informations sur le net et voilà, mais sa reste un outil performant, qui peut remplacé l’ humain, point a prendre au sérieux, il faut attendre un peu pour pouvoir voir son évolution dans un futur proche. Maintenant il faut un encadrement rigoureux, pour l IA surtout pour qu’ elle ne remplace pas l’ humain, mais c’ est un sujet délicat à considérer. Maintenant si l IA remplace l’ humain un revenue universel ne semble pas une solution cohérente , il as plusieurs facteurs à prendre en compte, quelle sera le salaire distribué, l’ inflation, comment vont comblé ce vide du travail, l ’ ennuieé, etc. etc. le bien être mental sera t’ il touché ? Il y a plusieurs solutions à exploiter pour créer un équilibre. La question est ? Il faudra un équilibre entre la technologie et l’ humain et des lois très encadrés pour pouvoir garder un équilibre bénéfique pour l’ humanité.

Thanks for sharing. I like the "expand our cognitive horizons" timeline. It was interesting to listen to the rest of it as a puzzle piece. Let's see how things unfold.

Bottleneck is character itself.