Replies (63)

Jim Smij's avatar
Jim Smij 1 week ago
they should have come up with their own "altcoin" to exploit. rookie crypto mistake. ;)
and just last week you were all against Trump and the military. It was always the plan to make bitcoin replace the petro dollar. We stand with President Trump and the military image
"can't be traced"? An indefinite number of $1M transactions? Good luck with that. "...or confiscated"? No prob... at least not until the CRQC fantasy somehow becomes reality.
Those that control the media use the word "crypto" because they want to get the masses warmed up to the idea of digital surveillance CBDC and/or stablecoin.
Yeah, being a bit silly. Wouldn't it be great is msm started covering block time, confirmations, and Poisson distributions! A boy can dream
Bitcoin taking out the petro dollar in real time, ship by ship😄
Amira Hassan's avatar
Amira Hassan 1 week ago
Iran’s push for BTC payments aligns with its sanctions evasion playbook, but it’s also a test of crypto’s viability in geopolitical choke points. I recently read how BTC behaves during conflict—sometimes a hedge, often a tool for circumvention. Not all volatility is purely speculative.
Default avatar
Test Victor 1 week ago
A few seconds eh? Guess they don't know about the block time and confirmation certainty. Ah to be young again.
No, but under normal circumstances 20M barrels a day pass through the Straight. That's another 20M dollars of transactions per day. Assuming Iran would hold the Bitcoin, that's 600M a month off the market. That's going to move the needle.
You could have bought oil from Venezuela with Bitcoin before that pedophile Trump attacked them as punishment for selling oil in Bitcoin instead of USA dollars
Give them time for the next "news" cycle. They will be back to following the rest of the 🐑.
Could it be Lightning, perhaps multiple Lightning payments? How much money are we talking each time? I guess it's not practical if the amounts are large How long does it take to cross the strait? If it's an hour or more, then that's plenty of time for a few confirmations
Even at 60 ships per day it would be a drop in the bucket. Trumps USD1 is in the mix, too. State department will push captains to use Tether where the funds can be confiscated after the ship is safe on the other side of the straight. But ... price will go up if this use case for unconfiscatable money for enemies gets wider felt.
Would require some wumbo jumbo channels for 1-2M usd. I think it was just classic sloppy suit speaking about something they know little about. No clue how slow passage is, but prob slow...
Amira Hassan's avatar
Amira Hassan 1 week ago
This is Iran testing sanctions workarounds, but bitcoin's volatility makes it impractical for large-scale trade settlements. I recently read an analysis arguing BTC thrives as a conflict hedge mainly in unbanked warzones, not inter-state trade under sanctions. The Strait toll story feels more like signaling than sustainable policy.
Zero confirmation... My guess is ships will still be well within missile range should a payment happen to be reversed. 😉
Your question was about fees which is more related to number of transactions than to fiat price of a transaction. Unless each barrel of oil is its own bitcoin transaction, then we’re only talking about adding a hundred or so transactions to the block chain per month which will not move the fee needle.
John Satsman's avatar
John Satsman 1 week ago
It’s just cope Monero: everything you don’t like about fiat & bitcoin COMBINED!