Instead of polluting all the events with a "client" tag can you guys please agree on publishing a kind:1729 event (I just made that number up) with the client name in it every day or every week or who knows?
Then you can have your popularity contests without forcing everybody to store and download millions of extra bytes.
Also please remove the useless "alt" tags (specially from kind:1), that experiment has failed.
Login to reply
Replies (19)
GM
Its not about popularity
LOL. GM fiatjaf π€
so you're saying relays aren't infinite free data storage? π«ͺ
π«‘
has nothing to do with a popularity contest.
...for you.

Whats kind 1729?
(He just made that number up)
Simplifying events is a great idea, now let's simplify our diets with nose-to-tail carnivore.
Idk, it's useful data for debugging and stuff too probably
No
I get it, but discovery remains a challenge. We need more attention to discovery/marketing and establishing βwhat nostr isβ imho. We can adapt.
Taxi cab number
IMO visibility and discoverability is valuable
IMO multi-client is Nostr core UVP vs competition and we should emphasize it everywhere always
no
I don't even see these client tags.
Which clients show the tags for other clients?
many other things have failed,
like retention ...