Thread

I must say the mere idea of a fork insta-triggered me but after digging into the project, I mean eating my pleb slop of course, I’m starting to feel excited about it.

END THE SHITCOIN CORE

Majority of Core devs are compromised. Core V30 is an attack on Bitcoin run by spammers and shitcoiners.

Yes, let's keep Bitcoin the best money not data storage

Can you name which ones exactly?

Yes. The ones who acked the OP_RETURN change from 80 Bytes to 100 000 Bytes. As well as the ones who nacked the PR for fixing inscriptions spam. We also saw lots of gaslighting and pure misinformation and manipulation from some of them in the recent discussions.

You didn't name them. Rationale for raising OP_RETURN was discussed many times in hundreds of places and it never was about allowing new shitcoins or spam. It also in effect doesn't allow anything new of this sorts. I don't see how NACKing something translates to being compromised. As for gaslightning and pure misinformation, it's just your information bubble

I am aware you are not seeking the truth because you are a spam supporter too. Is it Jameson Slopp influence or another one, you know that best. See the reason why compromised Core devs refused fixing the inscription spam - PR being "controversial" But the compromised Core devs pushed OP_RETURN as if it is not controversial. Here some inscriptions spam resulted from the compromised Core devs actions. And we have now porn video in OP_RETURN too.

Here, refresh your memory. nostr:nevent1qqs2sa68pl6dsahmhe3af628rlxalnsm8khkzf7slus84xcu5j6gk8gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgkwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezumn9wshs2tpl20

Did I not name them long ago? nostr:nevent1qqsdgc7zgjkdpxl3yqwhq0atf58yprms6mxz3jxky9ncccgj4xrdjjgppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgcwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxvmm4de6xz6tw9enx6tcx95tyy

Dude I don't follow you and wont scroll your feed to find out

I do not support spam. I do not know a single Core supporter who does. It's a strawman you choose to believe

Ok have fun being coretard...!!!

But we have now easy way of storing big arbitrary data and lots of spam like the porn video in OP_RETURN with that change. When you support Core v30 that came from the compromised Core devs you are supporting spam. nostr:nevent1qqsfnlpdg63upgqykldpq42rmwjnyf7gd6m4kqgzxkty9qls54ryhtqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgewaehxw309aex2mrp0yh8xmn0wf6zuum0vd5kzmp00mpjm9

It wasn't hard before that, OP_RETURNS over policy limit were appearing regularly, and in fact there were cheaper ways to do that outside of OP_RETURN and up to 4mb

Data insertion was always "possible" before to add bad data but just never "officially supported" until core v30. Now read this 10 times before you respond back to me.

Regular OP_RETURNS? See this the gaslighting and lies I am talking about. We dismiss the possibility that you are just brainwashed because you have good understanding of Bitcoin tech. So you are just dishonest actor. nostr:nevent1qqs00m6p6x6z3vcswc2etg30g5yhuclp37x25nrkceapezrr0ch27hcpzamhxue69uhky6t5vdhkjmn9wgh8xmmrd9skctcpzpmhxue69uhkumewwd68ytnrwghszrnhwden5te0dehhxtnvdakz770e8un nostr:nevent1qqszh4g2au6a09xj57t5g3nnzvwsffvgln6d6nd8zwhqn89q8787glgpremhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet59uq3qamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd4hk6tc8c6pqf

Consensus says what's "officially supported"

You wouldn't get it...!!!

Consensus now can be fixed with BIP444. I am sure you are against it.

I can grant you, it wasn't regular. For 2 reasons, one I mentioned before, and they are related to each other: 1. Other to store data are cheaper 2. There was no economic demand to do this in OP_RETURN No economic demand is the only scenario where filters work. If there is economic demand, filters do nothing Now, it would actually be BETTER for the health of the network/noderunners If shitcoins/jpgs moved to use OP_RETURN instead of witness: 1. OP_RETURNs can be only up to 1mb, not 4mb 2. OP_RETURN consumes less resources than alternatives 3. Alternatives produce unspendable UTXOs, which grow UTXO set - the absolute worst outcome for node runners So by preferring (because you cannot stop it) witness/inscriptions instead of OP_RETURN you choose a result that has 0 effect if there is any economic demand, but harms all node runners and the network much more than OP_RETURNs So much for protecting node runners

I have no opinion really, haven't studied it yet, but I am against any rushed softworks and I do not think there is any emergency I also think "temporary" softfork is just stupid and risky But I welcome a reasonable consensus change solution, If we find one. I appretiate Knots camp moved to look consensus change solution. For the past 2 years Core side said you can only solve it on consensus level, so better late than never

Did I tell you, you are spam supporter? This exact BS led to the porn video in OP_RETURN and will lead to much more spam. You just excused spam instead of realizing from the given EVIDENCE that OP_RETRUN filters worked and kept OP_RETURNs less than 83 Bytes. The only way to add it was a miner directly to add it to a block which was more expensive and they are obligated to filter out CSAM. BIP444 can fix consensus too in addition to the filters.

Yes, I hear that strawman in any conversation with Knots side, got used to it and ignore it That porn video would never land If you guys were not screaming everyday for the past 6 months about possibility of this. The possibility which was always existed in bitcoin. v30 haven't changed it one bit. As I already told you, filters worked great when there was no demand, but you guys work hard to create the demand by constantly shedding light on this stuff. Besides, given the alleged content of the mentioned video, it's hard for me to find a reason any Core supporter would upload it, cui bono?. It looks like someone from Knots side wanted to "prove a point". But ofc this is speculation. I do not excuse any spam. Another strawman, hard to even argue with that, please find one sentence of mine where I am happy about spam in bitcoin

Moron risk doesn't go away if we don't talk about it enough. Maybe remove coretard mask first before you response.

Maybe you should have told you coretard friends to not blow up op_return limit in the first place. Why didn't you mention that part?

I see you are out of arguments, nice talking with you

Bitcoin is now open to abuse because of Core v30. We already have a disgusting porn video in the blockchain. To keep being Freedom Money and free from spam and csam the limits for arbitrary data must be small, like we had OP_RETURN of less than 83 Bytes for 15 years. And if that goes into Consensus that will fix it. But the inscriptions spam needs to be fixed as well.

Seccurity through obscurity. Great argument. Not.

Well, good luck