You didn't name them.
Rationale for raising OP_RETURN was discussed many times in hundreds of places and it never was about allowing new shitcoins or spam. It also in effect doesn't allow anything new of this sorts.
I don't see how NACKing something translates to being compromised.
As for gaslightning and pure misinformation, it's just your information bubble
Login to reply
Replies (3)
I am aware you are not seeking the truth because you are a spam supporter too.
Is it Jameson Slopp influence or another one, you know that best.
See the reason why compromised Core devs refused fixing the inscription spam - PR being "controversial"
But the compromised Core devs pushed OP_RETURN as if it is not controversial.
Here some inscriptions spam resulted from the compromised Core devs actions.
And we have now porn video in OP_RETURN too.

Here some inscriptions spam resulted from the compromised Core devs actions.
And we have now porn video in OP_RETURN too.

Here, refresh your memory.
nostr:nevent1qqs2sa68pl6dsahmhe3af628rlxalnsm8khkzf7slus84xcu5j6gk8gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgkwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezumn9wshs2tpl20
Did I not name them long ago?
nostr:nevent1qqsdgc7zgjkdpxl3yqwhq0atf58yprms6mxz3jxky9ncccgj4xrdjjgppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgcwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxvmm4de6xz6tw9enx6tcx95tyy