Replies (43)

BTC-Satan's avatar
BTC-Satan 2 months ago
Totally worth it. Need to get get of Taproot also.
BitcoinIsFuture's avatar
BitcoinIsFuture 2 months ago
GFY bad actor, your manipulations are disgusting. Also Core are compromised. No fork and fuck Core V30 malware.
BitcoinIsFuture's avatar BitcoinIsFuture
Chainway is one of the bad actors in Bitcoin. They try to turn Bitcoin into Ethereum like shitcoin. Citrea is their project in which the evil shitcoiner Lopp is an investor who exposed himself publicly being dishonest and manipulative liar. "We're hearing things like Citrea is better than Ethereum," Chainway Labs co-founder Orkun Mahir Kılıç told CoinDesk. "It'll be better with time, because there's like $1 trillion, as of now, sitting in the Bitcoin blockchain. It is the most secure, battle-tested and decentralized blockchain. And we are bringing decentralized finance to it." 🤡🤡🤡 https://www.coinglass.com/news/91227
View quoted note →
SatsAndSports's avatar
SatsAndSports 2 months ago
It's part of Segwit, and a bit complex Segwit blocks can be more than 1MB, but the pre-segwit nodes (they still work) look at just the first 1MB and therefore the blockhash is the hash of just the first 1MB Therefore, in order to have some hashing of the entire Segwit block, necessary to make sure we all agree on what is in the entire block, the hash of the remainder of the block has to be snuck into the first 1MB. The way they chose to do this was by putting it into an OP_RETURN in the coinbase transaction. i.e. that has the hash of all the witness data of that block image
As a fellow engineer, is this how you operate as a CTO? You cannot accept that your well founded engineering decision may be wrong? Just curious, is there any dissenting opinion around you, or is it silenced, or simply ignored?
You're viewing a prime example of how engineering discussions work. Someone makes a proposal, which then gets peer reviewed in an attempt to poke holes in it.
So your dismissive additude of others opinions is just a byproduct of your personality and not a reaction to the merit of the argument.
It requires a fair amount of ignorance to think functionality can be removed from Bitcoin without consequence. You wouldn't see such a suggestion coming from a protocol developer.
Context: there are obviously ways to ban it that don’t freeze 60% of Bitcoin. Pierre knows this. But some people just can’t resist the opportunity to dunk on the ‘other side’. image
Well, all great products has been built together with designers, researchers, product and domain experts. Engineers always geek out on their own
He gets lots of dissenting feedback on nostr at least. The majority seems to be dissent. I think he has a sadism streak to be honest. The glee and the taunting is excruciatingly unserious.
lesco's avatar
lesco 2 months ago
This sounds a lot like “leave the money matters to the money experts”.
Default avatar
Rand 2 months ago
2bizi with fam to research these days
So you got yours. Got it. At least this is starting to make sense. No need to be humble anymore
You laugh at my post, fine. But then you literally re-quote the one fellow influencer whose tag line is to "Stay Humble and Stack Sats"... When it suits your narrative... In or out of contexts... You're something else... Uff