The reasons why it has always been difficult for me to seriously believe in the one-world-huge-all-in-government conspiracy theory are multiple: 1) game theory leads us to think exactly the opposite because power is a finite and contestable resource; 2) human sociobiology leads us to think exactly the opposite because we are an intrinsically competitive, expansionist and traitorous species; 3) the history of civilizations leads us to think exactly the opposite; 4) an omnivalent conspiracy theory is not scientifically falsifiable, nor are the majority of the hypotheses put forward by its supporters; 5) last, but most important of all: those who really believe it have never participated in a condominium meeting. Men unite and divide at all levels of power. This means that cooperative/conspiratorial and competitive/conflictual processes coexist at all levels. Why should they behave differently at the top than at the bottom if the biology is the same? And even if, paradoxically, it wasn't the same: perhaps the "gods" of the ancient texts didn't slaughter each other?

Replies (3)

That said, I often find merit in many so-called conspiracy theories (which usually end up being labeled as conspiracy facts), but I don't subscribe to a singular, all-encompassing conspiracy theory that magically explains everything. To me, it resembles magical thinking. It may only serve as a comforting illusion, helping to alleviate one's feelings of helplessness in the face of the world's complexity and injustice. This thought process can solipsistically satisfy one's ego, allowing them to believe they are among the few who truly understand, while simultaneously justifying their inaction against such overwhelming and anonymous forces.
It is all good mate, you can believe whatever you want to believe. Maybe look into how secret societies work or how everything at the top level of government agencies is on a need-to-know basis and there are grave consequences for stepping out of line. You seem to be assuming that you know what kind of technology/resources the Controllers have. You seem to believe in official narrative history which is kind of strange. If you can't get reliable information on events that are occurring right now, why would you assume to have gotten reliable information on events that may or may not have occurred hundreds/thousands of years ago. Some of the things I've pointed out in the previous note are difficult to coordinate (e.g. Covid). A virus has never been isolated ( https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html ) so there is no evidence that viruses exist, but every country is poisoning their population with heavy metals. Kind of strange. There's always going to be some level of plausible deniability. You won't get Elon Musk and Bill Gates to come out and tell you that they are puppets and we live under a one world government. One other example: kind of weird that George Bush and John Kerry were both members of the Skull and Bones secret society at Yale and ran against each other in the 2004 United States presidential election. This is just 1 cherry-picked example of many. The coincidence stack is amazing (if you have an open mind and eyes to see). But to each their own.