It is all good mate, you can believe whatever you want to believe. Maybe look into how secret societies work or how everything at the top level of government agencies is on a need-to-know basis and there are grave consequences for stepping out of line. You seem to be assuming that you know what kind of technology/resources the Controllers have. You seem to believe in official narrative history which is kind of strange. If you can't get reliable information on events that are occurring right now, why would you assume to have gotten reliable information on events that may or may not have occurred hundreds/thousands of years ago. Some of the things I've pointed out in the previous note are difficult to coordinate (e.g. Covid). A virus has never been isolated ( https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html ) so there is no evidence that viruses exist, but every country is poisoning their population with heavy metals. Kind of strange. There's always going to be some level of plausible deniability. You won't get Elon Musk and Bill Gates to come out and tell you that they are puppets and we live under a one world government. One other example: kind of weird that George Bush and John Kerry were both members of the Skull and Bones secret society at Yale and ran against each other in the 2004 United States presidential election. This is just 1 cherry-picked example of many. The coincidence stack is amazing (if you have an open mind and eyes to see). But to each their own.

Replies (1)

We cannot know anything with certainty. This is a philosophical truism since Plato times at least. Therefore everything is theoretically possible, both yours and mine theories. Maybe we also live in a universe-wide simulation of an alien specie with orange tentacles, but we cannot prove it. 😹 At an ontological level everything is just opinion, but we should cut the cake of reality somewhere...my personal take is there isn't a coherent and persistent collusion among different civilizational states/regions or their rulers, neither an uncontested invincible great plan for world domination that involves every top player in the world. I believe in a kind of contested western/anglozionist/euro-angloamerican/globalist elites (..call whatever you want) plan for "world domination" that is evolving in the last 3 centuries with up and downs and different internal schism / civil wars. Nothing too much coherent and inevitable provided that power corrupts and as I said previously in every human secret and open organizations, factions always tend to emerge and start to fight each others. Collusion is always temporary and precarious.