Great video by Dr. Sam Bailey on how viruses don't exist and have never been isolated. Dr. Tom Cowan goes into more detail in this video. https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html When it comes to these massive "conspiracy theories", most people usually say: "There's no way that's true. Do you know how many people would have to be in on it?" And of course, not very many people would have to be in on it. Most doctors still vaccinate themselves, their children, and their pets even though vaccines are used to depopulate. However, many of the main puppet politicians are likely in on it (US, Russia, China, India, Iran, Israel, etc.). The Covid scamdemic was a mask off moment for our One World Government.

Even with all the implicit and explicit yield curve control, bond yields are slowly rising. I am of the opinion that the Controllers can prolong the fiat ponzi for much longer than most think, but will eventually decide to rug. Why? Because all fiat currencies eventually fail, and the Controllers will definitely decide to fail the current financial system in a carefully preplanned fashion to avoid excess chaos. If markets were efficient, bond yields would be in the double digits (and then most would realize that with current debt levels this is game over). However, markets are efficient to constraints. Most of the bond holders in the system are captive - meaning they are aware that it is a mathematical certainty they will get robbed if they buy bonds, but they are forced to. So bond yields are fake and managed, just like the prices of most, if not all, assets. Yield Curve Control (YCC) = Central Bank commits to cap yields on some part of the curve (say 10Y at 4.25%). If yields try to rise above the cap, Central Bank buys bonds in unlimited size to enforce the level. It's a way to say: "Beyond this point, the bond market no longer gets to vote on our fiscal/monetary mix." Yield Curve Control is the bridge that lets the Controllers carry an insane nominal debt pile through inflation surges, regime shifts, and crises, without allowing yields to reflexively spike and force default. With YCC, the curve is no longer a sensor; it's a policy-controlled output. You often hear about explicit YCC (Japan style), but the whole fake fiat system is designed around implicit YCC. The logical question is: - "Who are these rich retards who keep buying bonds and keep getting robbed just so they can fund their own enslavement?" Most people/companies who have lots of money usually know that owning bonds is a losing proposition, so you have to force them to buy your useless paper. States design the rules so that banks, insurers, pensions, and autopilot funds end up long bonds, and then bonds get expropriated in real terms. This is the path of least resistance. Retail with direct bonds is rounding error. So the bondholders are the institutional skeleton that anchors the regime: states, banks, pensions, insurers, big funds, and foreign sovereigns. Why them? Because they are controllable, slow, diffuse, and essential. They can't easily run, can't easily revolt, and can be quietly sheared to fund whatever comes next (AI governance).

Joe Kent, the US Director of the National Counter-terrorism Center just resigned. This guy has the highest security clearance in the entire US government, so if I had to guess, he probably has good reasons to believe this war won't end anytime soon. Also, "Director of the National Counter-terrorism Center". Most of the terrorism throughout the world is perpetrated by the CIA and Mossad (practically the same thing). The CIA has almost always used false flags to get Americans to support the next big bankers' war. However, this time there was no false flag and most Americans are seemingly opposed to this war. Did this guy think that there would be a false flag CIA operation to get more people to support this war? He "lost his life in a war manufactured by Israel", and, it was highly likely they were going to use him as a scapegoat for future false flags. As Henry Kissinger wold say: "Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy." It seems to me the US is using this war because they need a plausible reason to step down from dollar hegemony (

The US-Israel war with Iran brings us closer to the Great Reset

The Controllers have a multi-problem set: unsustainable debt, fraying US hegemony, need for tighter control rails, and a desire to re-center around...

). US hegemony is expensive and brittle: - Dollar as sole reserve demands large, persistent deficits. - Weaponized finance (sanctions, seizures) pushes others to defect. A perceived defeat / stalemate against Iran provides a reason to frame: - partial dedollarization, - more multipolar arrangements, - more gold-based settlement, as reluctant necessity rather than voluntary surrender. The Controllers effectively want to move from US-dollar hegemon to multi-bloc gold-backed settlement without a clean "US surrender". They need a credible geopolitical reason for: - US relative humiliation, - reserve shifts, - new settlement arrangements, without making it look like a board (One World Government) decision. You can think of it this way: - Current system = dollar + US Treasuries as core reserve/collateral. - Endgame = fiat currencies float, but physical gold is the final settlement asset between blocs (tokenized, physical, or rewriting ledgers in warehouses throughout the world). From last year: "China is considering setting up overseas gold warehouses to support international settlements via the Shanghai Gold Exchange, according to the People’s Bank of China (PBOC). This move aims to expand the use of the RMB benchmark internationally. The Shanghai International Gold Exchange is key to China’s de-dollarization push, offering RMB reserve holders the opportunity to convert into gold. The RMB is now used for most inbound and outbound transactions, according to the China State Administration of Foreign Exchange." (

What our financial system will look like after the coming reset

Gold at the top, CBDCs in the middle, neutered paper claims at the bottom.

)

Elon Musk keeps spamming this "universal high income" nonsense 😂 "All jobs will be optional. There will be universal high income." What could possibly go wrong if you put every citizen on the State's payroll? Surely, they won't abuse UBI (Universal Basic Income) in any way. Unfortunately, UBI is going to be inevitable. And UBI is not just "free money" as Elon would like you to believe. It's a control rail to manage the losers of the reset, stabilize consumption and harden behavioral obedience. Unfortunately, it's not about "ending poverty" 😂 UBI is a centrally engineered, always-on income stream from the State to individuals, delivered through traceable digital channels, with conditions hiding inside the surrounding system (ID, tax, social credit, eligibility rules). UBI is going to be perfect for soft policing: - Carrot: "Behave, and your floor is guaranteed." - Stick: "Break certain rules (tax, "health", speech, protest in the wrong way), and administratively you can be investigated, delayed, or temporarily cut off." It is a perfect on-ramp to the CBDC + ID stack. "To get your UBI, you must:" - register your digital wallet, - verify your ID, - keep your biometrics up to date, - accept the terms (AML, travel-rule, etc.). That brings everyone into the rails they already want for tax, surveillance, and capital controls. So essentially, UBI = social shock absorber + behavioral throttle after they've run the Great Reset.

If the name of a company contains the words "truth", "honesty", "transparency", "safety", etc., you can be almost certain it's a scam. Shout-out to "truth social" 😂 Inversion is the core operating pattern for modern control systems. Inversion = when the label and the function trade places. - "Freedom" rails used to tighten control. - "Safety" doctrines used to centralize risk. - "Decentralized" tools pinned to centralized choke-points. - "Protection of property rights" used to rewrite who owns what. - "Transparency" means: you are transparent; the system is not. Blunt tools: - naked expropriation, - open censorship, - outright bans, - top-down classification, ... all burn legitimacy and trigger resistance. Inversion is cheaper: 1) It piggybacks on real desires: - "Protect my kids." - "Prevent the next 2008." - "Save the planet." - "Give me better UX." 2) It lets the Controllers pose as: - protectors, - technocratic fixers, - responsible adults …while the actual consequence is: tighter rails, fewer exits, more programmable constraints. 3) It's self-enforcing: - people defend the inverted rail because they're attached to the original value word. If you attack the rail, most people hear "you hate safety / fairness / the planet / children". So inversion is not decorative; it's the main way to turn: - legitimate needs -> high-acceptance control systems.