A short but accurate lesson from history… In 1773 there was no United States. The people involved in the boston tea party were british subjects living in the NA colonies. They were governed by Britain. Taxed by Britain. But absolutely had no representation in british parliament. When parliament passed the Tea Act it granted the British East India Company a monopoly on tea. The tea was cheaper but accepting it meant accepting taxation without consent. The colonists understood the implication. So they acted. On December 16, 1773: Colonists boarded British ships in Boston Harbor. Dumped 342 chests of tea into the water. Caused no harm to people. Took nothing for themselves. It was a peaceful act of economic resistance. It was a demand for legitimacy. If we are subjects we deserve representation. If we have no representation you have no right to tax us. Britain responded with punishment, not reform. That escalation led directly to the American Revolution. Why this matters… The Boston Tea Party revealed a timeless truth. Power depends on participation. Systems survive because people comply & obey. When consent is withdrawn calmly & deliberately… legitimacy collapses. So here’s an important question history leaves us today with… If value is extracted without consent… if money is debased without representation… if decisions are imposed without a voice… Is the Boston Tea Party just a moment in the past or a reminder of what people do when lines are crossed? History doesn’t repeat. It reminds. Is it time for an American Tea Party? ☕️ Do not obey! Resist. GM nostr ☕️💜🗽🧡 Timestamp of freedom 936506 image

Replies (29)

Troy's avatar
Troy 3 weeks ago
Would you say that an equivalent modern action would be people burning Federal Reserve Notes?
Can't get over how much tea they actually dumped. These were compressed bricks, a single brick would last a family for a year. It was like enough for the colony to drink tea for a decade. Every fish in harbour along with a lot of other wildlife died from caffeine poisoning.
Troy's avatar
Troy 3 weeks ago
I would say using a private corporate fiat, that comes with a creation fee of paying back more than what is created, is a problem. I don't know how "modern" pyramid schemes are though.
Holding bitcoin through drawdowns is our act of mass defiance. We reject the claimed benefits of a coercive, extractive monetary system.
To play devils advocate wouldn’t the other side say we have representation? We “vote” people into office etc.. this is what big government supporters would say. I firmly believe they don’t represent us because the people running for office are usually from the same socioeconomic background. They don’t know what it’s like for the common man working a 9-5 so we can’t really expect them to understand our situation.
Default avatar
OnJay 3 weeks ago
This was a historical moment and a big mistake. Instead of: “If we are subjects we deserve representation.”, they could have stopped being subject to government and be anarcho-capitalists. Instead, they chose being subjects, to another government. Nothing heroic here to be honest.
Anarcho capitalism wasn’t a viable exit in the 18th century. They didn’t choose new masters for comfort bro they broke a monopoly on power with the tools available.
Live up to the declaration of independence the people above fought for. "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security"