Then do it, but calling the position of people who are concerned with core currently "propaganda" and "hate" is shallow and counterproductive, in my opinion.
And the sword cuts both ways I've heard a core contributor calling people that disagree with them, cultists, and comparing them to cattle.
There is certainly a very vocal polarized set of people on both sides.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
there has been an insane amount of hate directed toward "core devs", aka me and a handful of people. please don't lecture me about being shallow and counterproductive. all the core devs I know are extremely thoughtful when they consider changes, in terms of how it may effect decentralization and incentives.
seeing most of nostr attacking some of the best devs in this space that are working tireless to defend bitcoin against centralizing effects has been pretty disgusting.
Well, we can probably just, as they say, agree to disagree because I find the core developers turning themselves into some sort of priest class as disgusting as any of the stupid things that I've heard people on the other side of the argument, throwing out.
Again, referring to users of the software as cattle or cultists is disgusting.
And the people who run nodes and even the people who just use the software not only have a right to say what they think about the direction of the project, but a duty to. And I feel as strongly that name-calling and polarized shallow arguments from their side is just as bad. None of that helps.
All it is is an easy way to virtue signal and plant your flag on the side that you want to be recognized as being a member of, in my opinion.
This is unacceptable to me.
Excellent take by me! :-)
The fact that many Bitcoin Core developers are paid by someone, when that someone is NOT YOU, does not make YOU a customer that gets to demand things. You need to hire developers directly if you want to work on your behalf.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →