Well, we can probably just, as they say, agree to disagree because I find the core developers turning themselves into some sort of priest class as disgusting as any of the stupid things that I've heard people on the other side of the argument, throwing out.
Again, referring to users of the software as cattle or cultists is disgusting.
And the people who run nodes and even the people who just use the software not only have a right to say what they think about the direction of the project, but a duty to. And I feel as strongly that name-calling and polarized shallow arguments from their side is just as bad. None of that helps.
All it is is an easy way to virtue signal and plant your flag on the side that you want to be recognized as being a member of, in my opinion.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
i agree the debate is sane.
And perhaps it is a good lesson for future.
Words can have been hurting here, but people were angry about it.
Next time there is a concern about a point, the earlier the debate is, the better it will end (on each side, even if there is only one blockchain).
Of course devs have done a good job.
But i agree you can't say to node owners (that control the network) just don't ask question and stay quiet, we do the best for you, you don't need to understand.
Node are as important as devs and miners.
That's why they have to find a way to communicate before it become a drama. To avoid all this rage words or heavy silence on any side.