Replies (24)
Reminds me of a Bitcoin lawyer who was often a guest on Junseth's podcast, forgot his name, who used to say: "I'm a lawyer, but not YOUR lawyer"
And what exactly these Devs pay Satoshi for his gift to humanity?
Arrogance is bliss it seems for core devs these days.
"If you don't pay my salary, stfu peasant"
No Sjors, our presence, stack, and nodes should all be relevant to you & the rest of the core devs.
The fact that you blatantly disregard this shows how badly we need competing options.
Thank you.
Your analogy doesn't work here, but it shows how you relate to the world - lawyers largely can be bought and paid for with ease.
Are you that easy Sjors?
The ethos of Bitcoin shouldn't be a game of who can pay the devs the most money to get what they want that's fucking absurd.
Arrogance is bliss for core devs these days.
Wow, just wow 😳.
Sjors Provoost
Excellent take by me! :-)
The fact that many Bitcoin Core developers are paid by someone, when that someone is NOT YOU, does not make YOU a customer that gets to demand things. You need to hire developers directly if you want to work on your behalf.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
~people disagreeing with you~
“YOU DONT GET TO DEMAND STUFF”
Weak shit, homie.
Regardless of opinions on this exact issue, core devs need some pushback & Bitcoiners need optionality.
I think this energy for example is abhorrent:
Sjors Provoost
Excellent take by me! :-)
The fact that many Bitcoin Core developers are paid by someone, when that someone is NOT YOU, does not make YOU a customer that gets to demand things. You need to hire developers directly if you want to work on your behalf.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
To Samson's first point.
Sjors Provoost
Excellent take by me! :-)
The fact that many Bitcoin Core developers are paid by someone, when that someone is NOT YOU, does not make YOU a customer that gets to demand things. You need to hire developers directly if you want to work on your behalf.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐀𝐆𝐄 BlackHat_Nexus 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐀𝐍𝐘 𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐃 𝐎𝐅 𝐒𝐄𝐑𝐕𝐈𝐂𝐄 𝐑𝐄𝐂𝐎𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐀𝐂𝐂𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐓
Fast, Available and Reliable for any of the following services
🤳 Recovery of lost funds
🤳 Facebook Hack
🤳 WhatsApp Hack
🤳 Instagram Hack
🤳 Spying
🤳 Windows Hacking
🤳 Recover lost wallet
🤳 Credit score trick
🤳 Recover Password
🤳 Gmail Hack
🤳 SnapChat Hacking
🤳 Cellphone Monitoring
🤳 Tik Tok Hack
🤳 Twitter Hack
🤳 Lost Phone Tracking
🤳 Lost IaptopTracking
🤳 Lost Car Tracking
🤳 Cloning WhatsApp
🤳 Cryptocurrency Wallet
🤳 Hacking
🤳 Iphone unlock
🤳 Got banned
🤳 Private Number available
🤳 Telegram hacking
🤳 Websites hacking
🤳 Hack University
🤳 IOS and Android hack
🤳 Wifi Hacking
🤳 CCTV hacking
🤳 Hack Bot Game
🤳 Free fire hack
🤳 Changing of school grades
🤳 Cards 💳hacking
No 🆓 services 🚫
WhatsApp +1 3606068592
Send a DM

Telegram
Telegram: Contact @BlackHat_Nexus
@BlackHat_Nexus
What about explicitly?
Sjors Provoost
Excellent take by me! :-)
The fact that many Bitcoin Core developers are paid by someone, when that someone is NOT YOU, does not make YOU a customer that gets to demand things. You need to hire developers directly if you want to work on your behalf.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
I hope he designated what he's funding in OPReturn.
Sjors Provoost
Excellent take by me! :-)
The fact that many Bitcoin Core developers are paid by someone, when that someone is NOT YOU, does not make YOU a customer that gets to demand things. You need to hire developers directly if you want to work on your behalf.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
Sjors does not care about node runners or Bitcoin.
That is why we run Bitcoin Knots.

holy shit this is actively anti-bitcoin
Geez didn't know you were this bad Sjors. thought I heard it in your voice on bitcoin explained but damn, worse than I thought
I thought bitcoin-core maintainers were supposed to be stewards of the protocol, not working for some patron who pays their salary.
So no, not an excellent take at all.
Do people that donate get a say?

No. Donations are not a contract for performance of specific tasks or the creation of a fiduciary relationship. They are appreciated of course.
Are you being contracted by someone to work on core?
This is unacceptable to me.
Sjors Provoost
Excellent take by me! :-)
The fact that many Bitcoin Core developers are paid by someone, when that someone is NOT YOU, does not make YOU a customer that gets to demand things. You need to hire developers directly if you want to work on your behalf.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
LMAO
"Core devs work for someone who isn't you" lol. Is this supposed to be a compelling reason to run Core?
Fair point—developers aren’t obligated to cater to users who don’t pay them. But in open-source, users choose to adopt software based on its relevance to their needs. If your code drifts too far from those needs or betrays core principles, people will start looking elsewhere. That’s not entitlement—it’s decentralization in action.
Look at Mozilla: Firefox didn’t fall because of bad engineering, but because they abandoned the principles that built user trust. The result? Gradual loss of relevance.
We’re not at that point with Bitcoin Core—but the growing number of users migrating to Bitcoin Knots should be a wake-up call, not something to dismiss.
Open-source thrives when devs and users stay in sync—ignore that, and alternatives will fill the gap.
Developers should be careful thinking that the only way to overpower them is to outcompete them. That’s not how the world works. If core believes that they can’t be competed with and it proves true, then “powerless” people might look to other solutions. No one has to outcompete you if you are no longer there.