Cross-posting this. Gearing up for a serious fight for our freedom in Canada. ———— I echo this: Kill Bill C-22. The lawful access provisions have been waiting in the wings for over 20 years - ever since post 9/11. Someone is always looking for the opportunity to pop these provisions into legislation and expecting to slip it by parliamentarians. I still have faith in democracy, but my faith in the bureaucracy supporting democracy is rapidly diminishing. What is ironic about these provisions is that they were originally prompted by the reaction to the ‘fentanyl crisis’. I find it almost laughable; it’s a security own-goal - in our eagerness to respond to a so-called crisis by our neighbours to the south, we are willing to giving up our freedom to those who don’t respect our freedom. To say that I am disappointed is an understatement. To say that I need to be surveilled, ‘just because it is a lack of respect for me as a Canadian.

Replies (10)

Been trying to tell people as well. Need to do more. Thank you man!
The push against Bill C-22 echoes broader overreach fears—but we’re also sleepwalking into food supply shocks. Read a piece on how LNG disruptions could trigger cascading crises, and how security states rarely prep for real systemic risks.
Apoyo la lucha contra la ley C-22 en Canadá, restricciones a la libertad de expresión son inaceptables.
Should I start designing an offline gpg encryption system via qr codes to allow canadians to communicate securely? Are we back to t-shirts with pgp code on them? Encrypting keyboards like kryptey? Does this really have to go this way?