I don’t share the same excitement for 100k. We should be at 200 by now. Shitcoins are still pumping 30% every week but the king moves slow.
But even at 200 I’d be sad that it gets you fewer sats.
If your time horizon is indefinite, the longer we stay low the better.
Login to reply
Replies (11)
We should be at 16k and accumulate, not blackrock.
This is worth reflecting on 🫂
That would be fantastic
100% I'd be fine with it being 50k still
still insulting we're not at 100k
View quoted note →
My timeline is my lifetime. That's all I really have. Indefinite is a myth. People use children or future generations to delude themselves into thinking that is an extension, but it isnt. They could piss it all away, die, etc and you can't control that. I want freedom and prosperity in MY lifetime. That by extension should apply to people in the future.
I think slow and steady up and right is the most sustainable, but I think staying too low for too long is a net negative for Bitcoin. Sure, you don't get ridiculously cheap sats, but that isn't what drives a free market. I also think the price increases encourage more people to come into the space. That is what initially caught my attention. I stayed for a lot more than that.
Life time horizon.
I don’t share the same excitement for 100k. We should be at 200 by now. Shitcoins are still pumping 30% every week but the king moves slow.
But even at 200 I’d be sad that it gets you fewer sats.
If your time horizon is indefinite, the longer we stay low the better.
View quoted note →
Still exciting though.
I would have been far better off staying in Fiat if this were the case. Bitcoin should be at whatever the market says it should be at. Which clearly is not 16k.
You can't get to 200 without going through 100. It makes no sense to not be excited about getting closer to what would excite you.
View quoted note →
True, I think each of us tries to strike a balance in this regard .