Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 13
Generated: 16:32:40
The term influencer has become a kind of slur that doesn't mean anything. Self sovereignty is the foundation of free will. I don't see where influencers enter that equation except in their ability to communicate with large groups of individuals.
2025-12-03 18:21:23 from 1 relay(s) 2 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (13)

For me, the term "influencer" has become close cousin to "celebrity"—running a show for the sake of a show (and incentives), describing someone with reach, but not necessarily an impactful mission. I don't bother listing names here, as this group rarely do have any actionable influence on me anyway. Instead, whether in the fiat/mainstream world or in Bitcoin, I look to mentors, thinkers, and doers: living examples of integrity and humble approach, people who can inspire or challenge my thinking. Individuals I respect—but don’t blindly follow. And for that category—yes, I can definitely put a few names from the public sphere: be Dr. Jack Kruse, Simon Dixon, Rob Brinded, Lyn Alden, Bret Weinstein, a Midwestern Doctor. And to close with my inner circle: lie kmy my father and my husband as well. Oh, and in case it’s a matter of definitions, I didn’t mean to attack your view. I simply wanted to express mine. Adding my 2 SATs 🙃
2025-12-03 19:19:28 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
“Influencer” today typically means an Internet or social media celebrity/personality. To say the term has no meaning is to ignore the very real impact they have on people’s habits, mindsets, and behaviors. Not all who call themselves influencers have influence, but there are people with real and powerful influence online, whether or not they consider themselves “influencers”
2025-12-03 20:08:45 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply