Would be nice to see more clients competing. Maybe even some that might offer so much that a person would pay to buy/use it.

Nostr clients or are you envisioning pay to use bitcoin node software?

Node

I’m a Knots maxi, but I’d also love to see other client implementations within the consensus rules, because I know Knots isn’t immune to what’s happening with Core right now. Switching between implementations should be as frictionless and easy as switching mining pools. Client decentralisation is just as important as mining decentralisation. The latter has become obvious in light of recent events.

Long term, Core should focus on consensus only and leave policy changes like mempool policy to 3rd party clients.

It takes a civil war to split a country in two. The fight we have now might lead to client splits.

if you are a bitcoin knots contributor, you should funding from anyone including opensats View quoted note →

It's becoming more and more clear to support only knots devs. View quoted note →

🤡 View quoted note →

Stop donating to Open Sats. Stop donating to shitcoin scammers like Core devs. #bitcoin View quoted note →

@Giacomo Zucco @jimmysong @Bitcoin Mechanic @ODELL . . . any response?

ODELL

if you are a bitcoin knots contributor, you should apply to opensats

@ODELL please consider funding this man! This is an anti-spam machine gun for knots noderunners

GitHub

Draft: Add support for Lua-based TX filtering by jasonfoura · Pull Request #119 · bitcoinknots/bitcoin

Bitcoin Knots enhanced Bitcoin node/wallet software - Draft: Add support for Lua-based TX filtering by jasonfoura · Pull Request #119 · bitcoinkn...

please have him apply