I am with you mate, I am not a digital gold enthusiast ๐Ÿ˜‚ I'll always find a way to win regardless. I understand psychology well, so I've made peace with whatever the attack vector. Focusing on anti-fragility > all ideologies.

Replies (1)

> You give too much credit to the AI powered central planners. I definitely do, because I scrape and read policy synchronization standards summaries every week, and unfortunately we happen to live under a one world government ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/rivalry-between-countries-is-curated ). Of course, there is a non-zero probability that we win. I've explicitly defined falsifiers, if not in every article, in 90%+ of my articles. I track most of these things weekly/monthly and adjust. We are the underdog by a wide margin. I just prefer to focus on the things I can control and the Bitcoin community is not one of them (nor is any other community, other than my immediate family/close friends). The only thing I felt like I owed the community is to publish most of what I've researched, so they can address some of these issues... or not. Which I've already done. So when you wrote: "At one point you need to stop riding a dead horse.", I don't know if the horse is dead, but it's castrated and domesticated. So I'll focus on other things until my falsifiers trip. This conversation gave me a deja vu to a conversation we had 2 months ago. 1) View quoted note โ†’ 2) View quoted note โ†’ I'll check the podcast out.
โ†‘