Yes, there is always hope because there are too many variables for their advanced AI models to map out perfectly every time.
There are too many known unknowns and unknown unknowns.
But I was referring more to the individual level. People are going to do what they think is right for them, so you should do what is right for you.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
> You give too much credit to the AI powered central planners.
I definitely do, because I scrape and read policy synchronization standards summaries every week, and unfortunately we happen to live under a one world government ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/rivalry-between-countries-is-curated ).
Of course, there is a non-zero probability that we win. I've explicitly defined falsifiers, if not in every article, in 90%+ of my articles.
I track most of these things weekly/monthly and adjust. We are the underdog by a wide margin.
I just prefer to focus on the things I can control and the Bitcoin community is not one of them (nor is any other community, other than my immediate family/close friends).
The only thing I felt like I owed the community is to publish most of what I've researched, so they can address some of these issues... or not. Which I've already done.
So when you wrote: "At one point you need to stop riding a dead horse.", I don't know if the horse is dead, but it's castrated and domesticated. So I'll focus on other things until my falsifiers trip.
This conversation gave me a deja vu to a conversation we had 2 months ago.
1)
View quoted note →
2)
View quoted note →
I'll check the podcast out.