Replies (38)

Imagine gambling on MSTR and then complaining about being margin called. Someone didn’t stay humble. Someone getting less sats.
Janis's avatar
Janis 5 months ago
The proverbial “Play stupid games, win stupid prizes” case.
BTC-Satan's avatar
BTC-Satan 5 months ago
Margin is always dangerous. $MSTR is best in an IRA where everything is secured by cash, the shares cannot be lent out. Margin in a volatile stock is just asking for trouble but I appreciate the margin meisters and the short sellers ... they create a great market, always honest, always discovering the true price, always oscillating. Option seller Heaven .. thy name is $MSTR.
frenchHODL's avatar
frenchHODL 5 months ago
For people who wonder, he's talking about MSTR holders, not Saylor
Motosashi's avatar
Motosashi 5 months ago
I ran that shit turbo and bought options on margin. 💪🏻. I have fucked around and have prepared my body to find out.
a1denvalu3's avatar
a1denvalu3 5 months ago
lmao didn't know saylor had a sense of humour
Debt/BTC NAV = 12%. IMO you don’t get the meaning of ‘margin call’. Also, as ‘Bitcoin VC’ (😂😂😂 it doesn’t get more oxy-moron than this) what do you think is a good level of Debt/Equity ratio? And how would equity be capitalised if not with BTC?!
People are roasting because Saylor found a way to print FIAT instruments and siphon away BTC. I think that’s genius. Will copycats be destroyed? 100%. But when that happens I hope you have a pile of cash to buy MSTR at mNAV < 1… and this will be when BTC will also be low in the cycle. When mNAV goes up to >1.8 convert into BTC. This is a way more efficient strategy than DCA.
Saylor is a bad actor. He wants custodial Bitcoin and Bitcoin backed by debt. Bitcoin should be self-custodial and debt free. Money backed by debt is what the Fed and other central bankers want.