Never let a crisis go to waste...

While y’all have been focusing your hate on the lefty green-haired clowns, the zionists and their puppets have been hard at work. And it gets more and more difficult to not assume that Israel might had something to do with Charlie’s murder. I mean what a better way to make everyone forget about Epstein than this? @HODL View quoted note →

Trump is our Boris Yeltsin

Here’s a fact-check of the claims in the image, with what is true, false, or unverified / misleading as of now: ⸻ ✅ What is True • Charlie Kirk was assassinated (shot and killed) on September 10, 2025 during a speaking event at Utah Valley University.  • A bill has been proposed that would allow revoking or refusing passports in certain cases related to speech or material support for designated foreign organizations.  • The House has passed a version of the Pentagon / defense contracting budget that contains an amendment targeting companies that participate in “politically motivated” boycotts of Israel (i.e. BDS-type boycotts), which could restrict them from receiving Pentagon contracts.  ⸻ ❌ What is False or Misleading • The statement “Passed an amendment that bans the Pentagon from boycotting Israel” is somewhat misleading. The actual amendment bans companies that boycott Israel (politically motivated boycotts) from certain Pentagon contracts — not the Pentagon itself boycotting Israel.  • The claim that “a bill allows Rubio to revoke passports of people critical of Israel” is an oversimplification / partially unverified. The proposed bill seems to deal with revoking or denying passports in cases of material support for designated foreign terrorist organizations, or related designations. Whether purely criticizing Israel (in speech only) would, under current language, suffice is disputed and flagged by your sources as a concern for free speech advocates.  • The claim that the government has already “passed” such a passport-revoking law tied to criticism of Israel is not confirmed; the bill is proposed, under discussion.  ⸻ ⚠️ Ambiguities / Things Still Unclear • Whether the passport bill would apply to any criticism of Israel, or only to those whose actions are judged to support designated terrorist organizations, etc. The wording matters, and that is debated.  • The scope and effect of the Pentagon / budget amendment: how broadly it will be enforced, what “politically motivated boycott” means in practice, etc.  ⸻ 🧮 Bottom Line The image mixes true events and legislative proposals with some distortion. Some of the claims are based in fact (Kirk’s assassination, happenings in Congress), but others are exaggerated or misleading (suggesting laws already passed, or very broad powers granted without qualifiers). If you want, I can pull up the exact texts of the relevant bills and amendments so you can see the precise legal wording.