I never said knots had anything to do with a hard fork. Knots is a node implementation with a different default relay policy. This relay policy was ineffective at stopping spam, which is why BIP110 now exists. It is the knots node runners who are now pushing BIP110 because filtering at the relay policy level did not work, so they have moved to the consensus level, which even Mechanic admits is not the right place to do this. You still have not clarified how I am “corrupt”, but I’ll waste some more time responding anyway: 1) I don’t give a fuck about getting invited to conferences. They’re exhausting and the best part is the time outside the conference hanging out with friends at the bar. 2) I have *never* told anyone to run core v30. I’ve said run whatever you want. I’ve said I will NOT run corev30 and recommended that others NOT update their nodes either. Yes, I have friends who work on or around Bitcoin core in various capacities. I also have friends who run knots or support BIP110 and hate Bitcoin core with a passion. I have other friends who run knots but think BIP110 is a terrible idea. I know this is difficult for you to grasp, but it is possible to have friends on all sides of a debate. I had a great conversation yesterday with @Giacomo Zucco where we discussed this. I hope you’ll listen to it when it comes out. 3) I don’t give a fuck about Citrea. Why would Lopp being an investor matter to me? He doesn’t pay me. I literally pay HIM for Casa. And what the fuck does Peter Thiel have to do with me?? Maybe you should talk to Matt Kratter about Thiel, since he worked for him. Maybe you should get your facts straight before you start throwing around retarded accusations. I’m not your enemy, but you seem determined to make me one. I encourage you to do just a tiny bit of introspection and think about whether *i’m* the “influencer” you should be worried about…

Replies (14)

You position yourself where you are with your own choice, voice and actions. Everyone positions themselves where they are. Bitcoiners have their own opinions and their own points of view. Bitcoiners felt something was not right with Core and started asking themselves Why are Core doing this? Why are Core censoring Bitcoin contributers for mentioning Citrea? Why do Core's arguments make no sense? That is why they did it and because of that 23% of the Bitcoin nodes are running Knots. So what I am saying it is that I am not making you anything. I just get the information coming from you which reveals to me your position.
hodlonaut's avatar hodlonaut
Spent some time researching this View article →
View quoted note →
DPR's avatar
DPR 2 weeks ago
These aren’t serious people, Walker. I muted all the BIP110 Knotzis weeks ago and haven’t looked back — not worth the time. Running core 29.2 until this whole thing blows over 🤷‍♂️
There seems to be retards on both sides and genuine folks on both sides too.
R's avatar
R 2 weeks ago
You are doing great @walker! I have no idea exactly what things I agree or disagree with you about but I consider you a fully honest broker. All these idiots calling you corrupt don’t even know that you’d be the first one to help them start their own bitcoin podcast so they can say whatever they believe. They would rather come at you and try to leech off all the work you have done to build your audience. Eyes ahead and keep on keeping on sir, we’re thankful you’re in the arena doing the work!
Stop shilling for the core pedophiles. You know they were funded by Epstein. When you openly defend pedophiles and then say you're doing it as a bitcoiner, all that does is make normies think all bitcoiners must be pedophiles. That's all you're doing