Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 8
Generated: 03:27:11
All non-native non-ionising man-made EMF i.e. - Microwave frequency - Radio frequency - Dirty electricity - AC Magnetic - AC Electric - Blue light - Flicker irrespective of their frequency cause harm below our level of perception through mechanisms other than the thermal effects which everyone keeps referring to when they say "it doesn't have enough energy" The key here is to understand that the mechanism of damage with non-ionising radiation is different from the ionising radiations. via mechanisms like calcium efflux, intracellular dehydration and increased permeability of the BBB. Allan Frey in 1960s figured out the link between weakening of Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) & EMF exposure allowing toxins to enter the brain Perhaps the next question we should ask is If the blood-brain barrier is vulnerable to serious and on-going damage from wireless exposures, then what about The blood-ocular barrier (that protects the eyes) The blood-placenta barrier (that protects the developing fetus) The blood-gut barrier (which ensures proper digestion and nutrition) The blood-testes barrier (that protects developing sperm) to see if they too can be damaged by these wireless radiations? and if you read report from 29 independent scientists & health experts from around the world who put down an indepth report called "The Bioinitiative Report 2012" with over 1800+ studies showing bioeffects and adverse health effects of EMF from wires (powerlines, electrical wiring, appliances and hand-held devices) and wireless EMF (cell and cordless phones, cell towers, WI-FI, wireless laptops, wireless routers, baby monitors, surveillance systems, wireless utility meters smart meters, etc.) When you look at the data, You will quickly see that when telecom industry funds EMF research ↪ 68% of research showed no effects ↪ Only 32% showed harmful effects When there was no money from the wireless industry ↪ 70% of studies showed harm ↪ 30% showed no effects And that funding bias is not a coincidence, it is how they play this game. If you want to control the narrative, you do not need to control the physics You just need to control the studies people hear about. Telecom companies will proudly say “Look, most studies show no harm” while quietly forgetting to mention that they paid for a big chunk of the “no harm” pile. Now zoom out for a moment We already know: - The mechanism of injury for non ionising EMF is not about breaking DNA directly like X rays or gamma rays - It is about disrupting biology - Messing with signalling - Messing with voltage gated calcium channels - Messing with membranes and water structure - Messing with barriers that are supposed to stay tightly sealed Once you accept that the thermal argument is outdated you suddenly see why so many different systems can be affected Sleep Mood Fertility Cardiovascular system Blood sugar control Neurodegeneration They are all deeply electrical and deeply dependent on timing and membrane integrity. Now come back to those barriers If EMF can weaken the blood brain barrier Why would we assume the blood ocular barrier is magically immune when the eye is basically an exposed extension of the brain Why would we assume the blood testes barrier is perfectly safe when sperm development is already known to be extremely heat and stress sensitive Why would we assume the blood placenta barrier is untouchable when it sits between a rapidly developing nervous system and a world full of signals we never evolved with We have built a civilization that is basically soaking every barrier in chronic fields and then acting surprised when we see - Exploding infertility rates - Earlier and earlier vision problems in kids - Neurodevelopmental disorders - Gut issues and “mystery” inflammation everywhere Instead of asking “What tiny narrow outcome does this one short study show under these carefully controlled artificial conditions” We should be asking What happens when you stack - A cell tower 50 meters away - WiFi in every room - Bluetooth in your ears - A phone in your pocket - Smart meter on the wall - Dirty electricity on the wiring - LED & screen blue light in your eyes till midnight Every single day for decades starting in the womb. That is the real experiment And NONE of us consented to it. nostr:nevent1qqsvnv0kwxrh7a3f8fawuj3qd093trwnv2vwj2ampuqjd86vaxgfskgzypx9lapv7qras09zh0thcacg2yfs2sru0l5kaxuqxj3te04yle95yqcyqqqqqqg00dyyn
2025-11-27 06:06:42 from 1 relay(s) 7 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (8)

Great post Soooooo many questions Ever done a podcast talking about this stuff? DM me if of interest as I’d love to learn from you In our house renovation, we’re putting a EMF protective paint on all the bedroom walls, mesh on the floor, a special fabric in the curtain, to create a dead zone for night time So at least 8 hours of the day whilst asleep we won’t be pumelled by EMF We actually had an EMF test done on the property before purchase Will hardwire Ethernet, have no WiFi at night, get red lights everywhere, Interested to see how we feel / sleep once done Ps - the wireless headphones are the worst!
2025-11-27 08:15:43 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
Any resources you recommend that helps find a balance between the utility and harm of our current electric/digital world ?
2025-11-27 08:17:39 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
This is just another thing, or things I should say. Asbestos, smoking, processed foods, seed oils... Going right back to the literal saying "canary in the coal mine." All things they said were harmless and or even promotes them as being good for you. They had drs in the 40s/50's doing advertisements for cigarette companies
2025-11-27 09:09:15 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
So is it fair to say that the damage from nn-EMF is less about direct damage to DNA and more about artificially lowering your guard down against toxins? In other words, nn-EMF is the destabilizer that leaves us vulnerable, not necessarily what delivers the final blow?
2025-11-27 14:05:08 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply