your assumptions are based on bitcoin price not rising to keep pace
it has succeeded in doing that for 15 years because it was well designed.
arguments against the mechanism by which it achieves that are based on keynesian economic models which have been used by central bankers to promote the idea of a constantly inflating monetary system
bitcoin's ongoing operation disprove this idiotic thesis, and trying to use this to fud bitcoin as a fanatic for privacy coin simply fall flat. carry on with your fantasy as much as you like it's not going to change the empirical facts that bitcoin WAS designed well and no shitcoin has been able to get a word in edgewise since then.
it's a waste of time, but it's your time that is being lost. life is not eternal. principles are.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
You're the one assuming price will rise forever. That's a big assumption.
Past performance is no guarantee of future performance.
All you have are claims and speculation. Didn't even try making an argument.
Didn't mention privacy coins once, but glad they're on your mind.
start poking holes in the security model or the emission schedule and they immediately start screeching "keynesian!!!"
this is the 247th time I've seen a bitcoin maxi claim immunity from criticism or having to make an actual argument by calling the other person a keynesian
View quoted note →
What happens in a post USD world when everything is measured in BTC? Against what is BTC supposed to rise? Against itself? This only works because most BTC (fiat NGU maxis) operate on a mental fiat standard.
It's when wrong design decisions will become obvious to more and more people.