dude puts tiny image, pays 10000x more than it would, it's still not bip110 valid and claims 110 doesn't work.

"I'm against spam but here are10 shitcoiner arguments for why we should do nothing about spam." View quoted note →

your brain gymnastics doesn't invalidate anything. you didn’t debunk anything, just redefined it until it sounded wrong.

BIP-110 still makes your transaction invalid Yes, it does but I could just make a different one that simply uses more inputs/pushes/witness elements. - >>Lmao. and still he paid 22 usd with the a sub sat mempool.

👀 View quoted note →

v30 dies 🤷🏻‍♂️

Pepe López

@ManyKeys @ODELL 
what do you think about the thousands of v30 fans still running a banned version by the core itself ? 
bad look for a cri...

who did this?

thanks

what is target of BIP-110 stop spam or make it harder to put into chain? it that case it was bit hard work for him to bypass that yellow gate yes, he paid some sats, dont forget he is not spamer. those guys who want sell monkey jpeg for milions of sats they will pay such fee without problem I join one discusion group where that guy is {who make that knotslies}. another member just took that TX and ask AI to reverse it. after lets say 30min he has python script which can generate such TX. AI model did not understand exactly reason for some "part" but it is working model. I AGREE, I dont want spam in blockchain. problem is that it is not easy, SOMEONE has to create rules and I think that much better place for spam is OP_return that UTXO

Zackly.