Tea > coffee

Systems are bad when they don’t have correction mechanisms. Capitalism and anarcho-capitalism have one that works, but it can be co-opted by the state. Then the system turns into a mix of capitalism and socialism, and the correction mechanism starts fighting off attempts to fix the system and instead begins defending the faulty system. Eventually the distorted market starts producing bad incentives in perpetuity. At first it’s like a jailer trapping the customer, and eventually the customer starts defending the jail. At that point the jail runs itself. It’s the same issue with Core re: spam.

Don’t care about “ideologies”. What matters is society’s direction of control: top-to-bottom or bottom-to-top. “Direct democracy” seems to be one of the best approaches for the “bottom-to-top” model. It should confer fair playground for everyone by its intrinsic decentralised nature and a fair distribution of wealth based on society’s needs and individual’s capacity to fulfill those needs. Unfortunately, throughout history, the direct democracy systems failed, not because the concept is bad, but because of EGO&GREED which (unfortunately) are built in human nature. This is how “representative democracy” was born for example. Therefore all the ideologies you mentioned could have SOME of their characteristics present in a direct democracy system, but without the top-to-bottom control mechanism which would invariably trigger at some point one of those ideologies become predominant and slowly destroying the other useful characteristics from the other ideologies. This will invariably morph that society into a top-to-bottom controlled one. Let’s stop choosing between “ideologies” and start thinking about “control”. The first step would be the self-control of ego and greed , at personal, individual level. 😉

🫡😁✌️

"Corporations pushing unnecessary products is a fair critique—but conflating that with all economic systems feels reductive. Extreme ideologies fail, but China’s state-capitalist model shows pragmatism can work. Their focus on long-term R&D (while the US chased short-term tech bubbles) paid off, as this piece breaks down: https://theboard.world/articles/china-won-brain-race-america-building-better-mouse" (280 chars exactly, excluding URL)

They're distractions to sway your thinking away from nature, from genetics and race. "Communism" is a lie and fraud from its inception, and can only come from a jewish mind. Once the people can think clearly, racially, it's the beginning of the end for our rulers.

Anarcho-Jungianism All systems fail if the participants are not individuated.

Well... there's a religious side to all of that: Socialism was first created by the Jesuits during the French Age of Reason, which then led to the French Revolution. Communism was next in that line if I'm guessing correctly, followed by fascisim, of which were also Jesuit-scripted as well. Anarcho-Capitalism I've never heard of, as that's also likely a use of Jesuit ideologies disguised as something liberating.

Democracy was actually proven to be a mathematical impossibility, in any form. Meritocracy is where it's at. It was like this for over 5,000 years, and we've deviated from a meritocratic form of government.

And what direction the control is in “meritocracy”?

Basically, those who the most ability and/or talent in a particular skill are where the economic goods and/or political leadership is vested.