You're second person to make this point... maybe it's more confusing than I thought.
You can write statements with letters that define numbers, eg "the smallest number greater than 3" defines 4 (in integers).
Take all 60 letter or shorter statements (finitely many). Toss out those that are gibberish or don't define a integer as they're irrelevant, and you have a (even smaller, though besides the point) finite set of sentences, hence integers. That leaves infinitely many not defined by such statements. There is a smallest positive one. Bingo bongo
Login to reply
Replies (3)
I get all that. But wouldn’t it make more sense with numbers?
It's kind of a twist on saying things about statements themselves, leads to contradictions. The classic "this statement is false" type of thing, or "the set of all sets that aren't a memeber of themselves" imo
base32 uses 26 letters and 6 digits
you can consider a byte to be base 256 also, variable integers that use a continuation bit are like a compact base 128 encoding