Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 1
Generated: 16:05:08
its called "regulatory capture" if I've said it once I have said it a thousand times nostr:nevent1qqsxqccjgth0kndmjfs9vpucas250x69ez7l7c59qcmpynnhndc3ltcpr9mhxue69uhkummnw3exx6r9vd4jumt99aex2mrp0ypzqwmleq3kz8c6at4x8m3m76djtw92zmkxaqw34lpeqf5q3lsegd20qvzqqqqqqyvufpah
2025-12-05 06:25:18 from 1 relay(s) 1 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (1)

It's an issue if you're exchanging fiat for bitcoin at regulated exchanges. Meaning if you're accepting it for goods and services, it's not. If you're using KYC-free markets (such as bisq, peach, robosats, hodl hodl, etc) it's generally not (in lieu of opsec fails) it's not. And if you're mining, it's not. Coinjoins, lightning swaps, and subswaps do generally make it less of an issue if you've bought kyc but there's always the record that you had some, and the more that is the harder that is to obfuscate with any plausible deniability. Nobody thinks you donated 50 BTC anonymously. Not that there's anything illegal about failing to declare capital losses on coins purchased kyc and sold on a p2p market...
2025-12-05 12:07:11 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply