If youβre begging for the state to surveil and criminally prosecute people who disagree with you, youβre on the wrong side of history.
Login to reply
Replies (36)
Anyone advocating for shitty porn to be kept onchain forever is on the βWRONG-ERβ side of history.
Absolutely dumb, this is one of the dumbest things I saw in the last weeks.
Are you threatening me?
No one is advocating for thatβ¦
Itβs very sad.
they have latched on to the "lifting op_return limits in relay policy enables csam" which is factually incorrect. this can happen today without any changes to core, and it doesn't make it any easier either due to preferential peering of libre relay nodes.
basically they are just using this factually incorrect statement to attack core devs and to attract state level attacks.
What do you think they will use the OP_Return for? Storing the Declaration of Independence? π
Itβs pathetic and gross. Honestly I was going to stay out of this debate but the Knotzis have forced me to wade in.
π―π―
You are deliberately being obtuse. Removing the limit will only open the floodgate. This will lead to MORE spam, porn, and shit, NOT less.
One point of control is too many when it comes things like Bitcoin.
Just like one point of control would prevent you from freely posting your thoughts. You wouldn't like that very much, would you?
No, Iβm not. You made a false statement. Correcting you is not βbeing obtuse.β
If youβre confused, read this:
Stacker News
A Comprehensive OP_RETURN Limits Q&A Resource to Combat Misinformation \ stacker news
My goal is to share a concise list of questions about OP_RETURN limits that we've answered on Stacker News, as the original thread has become unwie...
How?
There is no arguing with these people. No amount of proof will change their mind.
because uncapped op_return is the actual rules of the network. capped op_return is an unenforceable policy that is easy to route around.
now if we think this is bad, we should softfork an actual limit so its impossible to get around.
What false statement? You think removing the OP_Return will lead to more spam is false? Stop thinking economically only. Why open an attack vector for anyone who wants to kill Bitcoin? Remember, you CANβT roll back the chain. It only takes 1 CSAM to open up a can of worms and fuck it up for everyone. FOR WHAT? So miners can make another dollar?
how does changing a mempool filter fix the problem of datacarrier limit from taproot and segwit tho?
easy as in you can go to 
and put in whatever you want. this uses libre relay as their backend.
if you want something custom you can just download librerelay and send it that way.
people creating large op_returns with image data need to be somewhat technical anyways. if they can do that then they can download librerelay and broadcast it to a miner
there is no "upload jpg" on the bitcoin client, you will be using custom software regardless. and it can be as easy as a website. knots doesn't do shit all to stop it.
OP_RETURN Bot
OP_RETURN Bot will create an OP_RETURN output for you, you just need to pay the fees.
Sort of. Items as valuable now as the thing you've just mentioned. Independence from whom?
All non-monetary data transactions can be fixed.
Its because filters works. Thats why runes and ordinals shitcoiners are scared from tight nodes policies.
You are just someone else's nigger at the end of the day, hope you're fully aware of that fact.
Enjoy your posting. It'll eventually end.
Same to you, dubs.
nobody seem to care. both sides are focusing on wrong things.
Step 5 on deck
What exactly are you suggesting..?
do you want me dead?
who is going to rebuild it?
there are 100 core devs who contributed to core in the past 500 commits. your plan is to replace all of these devs familiar with the codebase with who exactly
all because a non-consensus parameter was tweaked, a parameter which has no affect on what gets into blocks. seems completely reasonable π
Your comment was unnecessary toxic
it doesn't work and doesn't align with reality. its explained here
Bitcoin Core
Bitcoin Core development and transaction relay policy
Bitcoin Core development and transaction relay policy
Preach! π
It took me a minute to get what you mean with this picture. Notice literally every response thought you meant use the ropes on devs. This isn't productive. Stay sane, people.