ANNOUNCEMENT: The University of Wyoming has established the UW Bitcoin Research Institute. uwyo.edu/bitcoin The BRI aims to produce high-quality peer-reviewed publications about bitcoin from all academic disciplines. First act: hiring @Andrew M. Bailey! Much academic bitcoin research is quite poor, because it's done by people who don't understand bitcoin. Mora et al predicted "bitcoin alone could push emissions 2 degrees". They failed to account for the difficulty adjustment *and* didn't know there was a block size cap! Others like Taleb’s infamous "Bitcoin Black Paper" are unaware of Layer 2s like Lightning, and others are unaware of the supply cap -- perhaps bitcoin's most distinctive feature. Others make faulty assumptions about bitcoin user demographics. These mistakes make their way into journalism, and policy. Bitcoin is multi-faceted in theory, and even more so in practice. Journalists can't be experts, so they rely on academics. Too many of those academics have let them down. The good news is that there is good academic research on bitcoin. Work by Will Luther, @npub18wgt...r2wn , @npub12lzw...ntw2 , @npub10afr...0xj0 , Matthew Ferranti, @npub1ws69...xzeg and others understands and explains bitcoin very well. But for academics interested in bitcoin, the incentives often don't line up. Few advisors will let their advisees focus on bitcoin, so bitcoin projects must be side projects. And without advisor or community support, these projects are rarely taken on. The Bitcoin Research Institute fixes the incentives. We provide a community who can support scholars and give critical feedback on their projects, and we provide funds for travel and lodging. We're removing barriers for scholars who want to work on bitcoin. More academic work on bitcoin should be done by people who understand bitcoin. The BRI aims to produce that work, which will filter up to journalists and policymakers. The University of Wyoming is the perfect place for this, with Sen Lummis, @Caitlin Long , State Sen Rothfuss, Law School Dean Julie Hill, Steve Lupien, bitcoin miners using all kinds of energy like @npub1k7tc...8edl , a School of Energy Resources, School of Environment and Natural Resources... The UW Bitcoin Research Institute is a 501c(3) nonprofit. Because of @Caitlin Long , the University -- and by extension the BRI -- can accept bitcoin directly. And UW allocates 4% of our investments to bitcoin, so if you donate bitcoin to the BRI, we will NOT sell it. If you're a scholar and you want to be involved, my DMs are open! If you're a journalist and you want to learn more, my DMs are open! If you want to support our work, you can do so here: https://www.givecampus.com/campaigns/49172/donations/new

Replies (26)

👀👀
Bradley Rettler's avatar Bradley Rettler
ANNOUNCEMENT: The University of Wyoming has established the UW Bitcoin Research Institute. uwyo.edu/bitcoin The BRI aims to produce high-quality peer-reviewed publications about bitcoin from all academic disciplines. First act: hiring @Andrew M. Bailey! Much academic bitcoin research is quite poor, because it's done by people who don't understand bitcoin. Mora et al predicted "bitcoin alone could push emissions 2 degrees". They failed to account for the difficulty adjustment *and* didn't know there was a block size cap! Others like Taleb’s infamous "Bitcoin Black Paper" are unaware of Layer 2s like Lightning, and others are unaware of the supply cap -- perhaps bitcoin's most distinctive feature. Others make faulty assumptions about bitcoin user demographics. These mistakes make their way into journalism, and policy. Bitcoin is multi-faceted in theory, and even more so in practice. Journalists can't be experts, so they rely on academics. Too many of those academics have let them down. The good news is that there is good academic research on bitcoin. Work by Will Luther, @npub18wgt...r2wn , @npub12lzw...ntw2 , @npub10afr...0xj0 , Matthew Ferranti, @npub1ws69...xzeg and others understands and explains bitcoin very well. But for academics interested in bitcoin, the incentives often don't line up. Few advisors will let their advisees focus on bitcoin, so bitcoin projects must be side projects. And without advisor or community support, these projects are rarely taken on. The Bitcoin Research Institute fixes the incentives. We provide a community who can support scholars and give critical feedback on their projects, and we provide funds for travel and lodging. We're removing barriers for scholars who want to work on bitcoin. More academic work on bitcoin should be done by people who understand bitcoin. The BRI aims to produce that work, which will filter up to journalists and policymakers. The University of Wyoming is the perfect place for this, with Sen Lummis, @Caitlin Long , State Sen Rothfuss, Law School Dean Julie Hill, Steve Lupien, bitcoin miners using all kinds of energy like @npub1k7tc...8edl , a School of Energy Resources, School of Environment and Natural Resources... The UW Bitcoin Research Institute is a 501c(3) nonprofit. Because of @Caitlin Long , the University -- and by extension the BRI -- can accept bitcoin directly. And UW allocates 4% of our investments to bitcoin, so if you donate bitcoin to the BRI, we will NOT sell it. If you're a scholar and you want to be involved, my DMs are open! If you're a journalist and you want to learn more, my DMs are open! If you want to support our work, you can do so here: https://www.givecampus.com/campaigns/49172/donations/new
View quoted note →
This might sound harsh... But it would be nice if you would be able to proof your affiliation with University of Wyoming. Maybe by using a proper and valid NIP-05 identifier?
UW Alumni here… will be following closely! Excited to see what sorts of research areas grow quickly in addition to the strong philosophy start
The trust issue is not about what you said, it is about who you are.
Aida's avatar Aida
Can we normalize that if you claim to be representing a official institution or to be a public figure you would provide a valid NIP-05 using a relevant domain as a proof of your claims? I know that there are exceptions where it can't be done, but in general I think this is quite reasonable requirement. #grownostr #asknostr
View quoted note →
Default avatar
wertyyryyr 1 year ago
I prefer talking to those who want to hear about it. Those people are mainly outside universities.
agree, after someone can read, write and do basic math can also start developing their own self-conscious and start learning from the world and from other people indipendently. Universities today, in the internet era, are full of the most dumb and less indipendent people in their late 20s wasting the most important years repressing the natural crearivity impulses a human should have. Not surprised by the fact that the academic world has been the most hostile to bitcoin and that they are the last people that started playing with it, even if in theory they would have had the knowledge to understand it first then the average joe. Fun fact, go university to study and glorify great human that made history because they dont waste their 20s being repressed in academics. There are always exceptions, great minds and good academic people, this is just my general point of view based on my experience.