I don't know. I haven't focused on it at all. Can't say I've cracked either book which is the case for a lot of the books I've collected. If we ever go back to no internet and no power though, I'm set on entertainment material for the rest of my life. Prefacing again my ignorance on the Talmud, the little bit that I have picked up on the subject of the Talmud is that, to some degree, it contains an "us vs them" mentality which focuses on division, not unity. That's one of the biggest reasons I like Imre's book. He does a good job of connecting the dots across various traditions. In my copy I have lots of pink highlights because pink is alliterative with perennialism so all perennialist links he makes, in my book, are highlighted pink. Any time he brings up Christianity, Sufi Islam, Hindu vocabulary, Buddhist vocabulary, etc. it got pink highlighter. My book has a solid amount of pink highlights in it.

I also haven't read the Talmud, but there are YouTube videos of people reading the pedophile part, so you could find that and then jump straight to the relevant part. I'd be interested in knowing if its really there, and if it still means that if included in its surrounding context.