Absolutely ridiculous.
Bitcoin is nothing without it‘s permissionlessness and censorship resistance.
Stick to TradFi if you want to censor.
Login to reply
Replies (17)
Actually kinda makes sense to me.
Permissionlessness seems critical to me. Can you elaborate on why you think their viewpoint makes sense? Genuinely curious.
People are so deranged and confused about the spam issue they don’t even bother to think through what they’re getting upset about. It’s all so stupid and tiresome.
View quoted note →
People are so dumb that describing very basically how bitcoin has always worked is considered an attack.
Bitcoiners are very easy to manipulate, ironically
Maybe reading comprehension should also be important to you lmao
😂🎯
Ahhh you got me so good
To answer my own question, permissionlessness is critical when using Bitcoin as money.
On the other hand, we don’t want anyone changing the Bitcoin protocol without consensus (let alone permission).
I agree permissionless money is critical. How much extra on top of that should be permissionless?
That question gets to the crux of the debate. I think I figured it out for myself:
View quoted note →
censoring content and protocol validity have two different objects.
Neal
I got distracted with a a side quest. But this message is important. Please share and discuss with bitcoiners you care about.
Reading comprehension failure.
Luke is 100% correct. Bitcoin is permissionless *money*. For permissionless other stuff you'll need to find another blockchain. You should check out Ethereum. It aligns perfectly with your "everything is a valid use case" mindset.
Permissionless money not permissionless arbitrary data storage network.
say it back.
