lol

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 View quoted note →

lmao

Called it 🤣🤣🤣 View quoted note →

If you still support core, wtf is wrong with you? View quoted note →

Is Luke Dashjr an authority on bitcoin core technicals?

Szabo has a degree in computer science and a degree in law. He says: "illegal content in a contiguous standard format, thus readily viewable by standard software, is more likely to impress lawyers, judges, and jurors, and thus is legally more risky, than data that has been broken up or hidden and thus requires specialized software to reconstruct. Such demos would be part of convincing these legal decision-makers that a defendant node operator had knowledge of the content."

X (formerly Twitter)

Nick Szabo (@NickSzabo4) on X

@_Checkmatey_ @OqqZinSmAiMYItG @crypt0e @callebtc A counter argument is that illegal content in a contiguous standard format, thus readily viewable...

And remember, this issue is not 100% technical and cannot be fully understood using technical arguments only.

Es un Spamer coñazo que no consiguió su objetivo con el spam de los Ordinals y sigue dando la turra, 🤡

He is a better authority than you, that’s for sure