β‘οΈπΊπΈ WATCH - Marco Rubio says that in the next few months, the U.S. government will use facial recognition to authenticate your photos for your passport, eliminating the need to go to Walgreens or CVS for a passport photo.
Rubio says this is being done for your own good and to save you time.
"Our security system will verify the facial ID."
Login to reply
Replies (19)
Awe, big gov always trying to make life easier for me. God Bless you lying bastardsπ
Datacenters, cameras everywhere, and facial recognition. Nothing to see here
Cue Americans giving Europeans shit for this stuff. π
Also, you can use air-conditioning in Europe, you just have to go and buy it.
We are typically 5-10 yrs behind the curve of totalitarianism. China, EU, the. US. It's been a fun cycle to watch π’
Move to darkest Africa. It's the safest place.
They meant less of the other people being in government.
I am to fix digital id, by doing it decentralised and with zero knowledge proofs, with a reputation mechanism. And cases like this would be impossible or need deep technical prowess. Users store and own their data encrypted on their own terms.
Please support the initiative:
First prototype is ready:
All open source free software. And then we go for adoption in society, apps and government.

Nostr Reputation Passport (nostr_pass) - Angor Hub
As Nostr gains traction in liberating people from centralised tech stacks and Free Cities become a possible shelter, free individuals need β¦ | Ta...
Cookie monster!
It isn't. The size of the government, it's debt, and it's budget tend to expand under the Republican Party, not shrink.
It expands regardless of party to be fair.
The welfare state will grow until it collapses under its own weight
73% of spending is just entitlements and the national debt. Republicans hire employees and expand defense and stuff for old folks, and cut taxes. Democrats hire beauracrats and expand stuff for old folks and single moms, and don't cut taxes.
I'm a registered Republican and I think defense is pretty much the only thing any federal government should be spending money on. That and maybe diplomacy, a federal court system, and a state department.
If they did that, the gov would be a quarter of its current size. Which sounds about right.
To this day, i still can't help but speculate how the state would be different with Ron Paul in office.
So do I, but we don't have him as President because we were too corrupt. You always get the government you derserve, unfortunately.
You build it, we install it...
Yep. People always prefer empty promises and propaganda over hard truth.
1/5 of working Americans are employed by the government (that's law enforcement, public school teachers etc)
Yes, but many are working for state and local governments.
trusting your data with them is always a brilliant idea π¬π«£