image Interesting. I don't think that if I were one of the richest people in the world I would worry about my wealth breaking society. I would probably try to rule the world, so that I can fix it 😄

Replies (8)

I know that ruling the world is not very anarchist. I would probably try to dispense with all of the governments of the world, and their nuclear weapons and militaries. The rule would be: there are no rulers, but God. No king but King Jesus.
I'd do the opposite, partly. Every home can have a modular nuclear reactor, and those can be weaponized to a relatively small but meaningful degree, thus giving both kinds of power to the smallest unit of society. Golden age of peace, backed by force, and abundant energy. Good proliferation.
because nuke bombs are a fraud. with AI, how is it they haven't already done it? because it's never actually been done. all of the documentary "proof" of bomb tests is dodgy. there is a french one clearly shows sign of compositing of images. and trinity, we are supposed to believe the first time they put all the pieces together, that it magically worked, flying in the face of all time history, especially edison, of a theoretical device working first time (took him 10000 tries until he found vacuum bulbs and fine tungsten). drones, on the other hand, are very real, and very easy to build with the help of AI. contains, AI software, even. the nonsense of nuke bombs will not go away until it stops being suitable for china, usa, france, india, etc who have supposedly got nukes, to own up to the actual fact they don't have any such thing. it's a whole industry manufacturing high purity isotopes - that only really have one use: poisoning people. you can certainly poison people with them. dirty bombs are real too. they kill a lot of people in a short period who are exposed to high levels of vaporized uranium.