To be a socialist/communist in the year 2026 you must either be a retarded follower or an evil leader.
Login to reply
Replies (19)
Satan
Mamdani is definitely some evil leader, talking about the "Warmth of collectivism" makes me sick.
Satanic or demonic.
Socialism for the ones that need bailouts and are too big to fail/close to the money spigot. Bankruptcies for the rest.
Guy who can not define a single political term hates people who can..
Wow, as if we didn't already know you felt this way.
You justified terrorism against Venezuela claiming they were socialists when they're actually nationalists.
You've repeatedly defended Donald Trump for raping children.
You defend the globalist bankers against all of their enemies.
We already knew you hate anyone that the bankers perceive to be a threat
lots have given up on agency and see technofeudalism, UBI and all included as just something inevitable
and to be a Feudalist is to be double retarded esp. in the age of free flow of information
I don't like mamdani either but collectivism doesn't have to be authoritarian.
The political spectrum is a spectrum
Whatta about those that walk like a commie, quack like a commie but don't finally come outta closet as declared commies?
You're describing philantropy.
Like King Charles, for example, who is one of the leading proponents of the "man-made climate catastrophe" scam.
https://www.youtube.com/live/8jaTt7sfI1k?si=5_2z3tJ9U1n0r4Yv
itβs all just degrees of socialism/communism. Just the latest example
You have no idea what any of those words means
There is not a single true statement in your noteβ¦
During the GFC banks and corporations were bailed out. They keep doing it in other indirect ways to prop them up. Individuals had to lose their homes and assets. Philanthrophy for the collective 1% group most are not a part of I guess.
Socialize their losses. Free market rugged individualism for the rest?
No, free market for them all.
I'm not a commie, there are no exceptions.
Ideally, yes that would be great, but they rigged the game in their favor and will always eventually find a way to rig it because they have the money and power.
I'm not saying communism is the answer, just that their are flaws in every system, even "free market" capitalism. Maybe decentalization and enticing human incentives are key in delaying breaks in systems?
Is "enticing human incentives" an excuse to rob people, like taxes or subsides? If so, no.
It has to be voluntary. Otherwise it's another name for communism.
No, more like bitcoin and how it incentivizes people to protect it once they are part of it instead of breaking it in their favor. Like the potential 51% attack through hashrate/mining. Miners are incentivized to protect it because of the gains they are making.