Replies (40)
Divide and conquer
What will people be radicalised into? I don't get this perspective.
I think Zarutska is symptomatic of a disfunctional society and Charlie was punished, and a warning shot for other commentators.
Try being someone who doesn't tan well and taking the subway into DC from Largo. Or, better yet, don't.
yeah, it smells, the way it all happens at the same time
I once saw a guy in the emergency department who swore the government shot a nickel sized hole in his heart using a laser.
People say all sorts of things.
I know a woman who served time for homicide and claimed it was aliens.
You don’t find it out she was basically supermodel beautiful, a Ukrainian refugee and he says into the camera (“got the white girl”)? He didn’t rob her or sexually assault her, just knifed her for no reason whatsoever, in view of witnesses, on camera?
A guy attacks a woman, literally stabbing her IN THE BACK (double cowardice!), now coming up with BS non-excuses to justify the unjustifiable.
Who raised that animal?
Yes, and he was mentally ill on top of it. But on the other hand, it’s a fact the CIA used mind-control techniques via MK Ultra, that ties to a lot of the insane murders that were national news in the 60s. Your guy in the emergency department wasn’t part of a national news story.
Base case is that’s the explanation. He’s just trying to avoid full accountability. But as I said, I’m not ruling out something more, given the circumstances.
Again, random person claiming something crazy is one thing. Person who is part of a national news story that doesn’t add up is something else. Base case, he’s just a psycho who snapped after being radicalized against white people, but not ruling out there’s something more to it. Was suspicious even BEFORE I heard his explanation.
It wasn't a news story, for the longest. And, even after it started being talking about, it was framed like "Butthurt conservatives try to make shooting a news story".
You are completely ovethinking this, and sound just like the other Apologists. Stop making excuses for murderers.
crazy is enough explanation.
the responsible parties are the ones promoting the race agenda. a big part of that cohort is the people running the councils and legislatures of these cities.
they put the powder out, and then leave the ones with the matches and psychosis to run around in the street and they light up the powder and everyone acts all surprised when it blows up.
Come on, Stella. That’s ridiculous. No one is making an excuse. If what I’m “not ruling out” is true, that’s not an excuse, it’s an entirely different scenario. And what I’m not ruling out is false, then it’s also not an excuse.
People need to be able to discuss possibilities without “you’re an apologist for murder!”
Ukrainian women tend to be good-looking. That's like claiming that a Swedish woman was good-looking is sus.
She was in street clothes and a cap, with glasses on, not an evening gown.
You’re missing the point! It’s not that the murderer thought she was good-looking! It’s that if she were murdered, the story would have legs in part because she was so beautiful. (And also that she was a refugee from a war, the irony and tragedy of that would make it even bigger.)
Again I am NOT saying this is what happened. I am only saying, my radar is going off big time. And that was before the guy said the government made him do it.
You don't want to believe your own lying eyes, so you're grasping at straws.
There are neighborhoods in the area that are as dangerous as war zones, and people get killed there on a whim or for a dare.
I have suffered this sort of shit doing down, every damn month, a couple of streets over, when I lived near DC. And then the DC sniper started taking pot-shots at people, from his car, for the lulz.
This is not anything usual. People are just used to it.
leaving crazy people to run around the streets after multiple cases of them brutally assaulting people is the problem. you can't apologize for this neglect of justice. half a dozen people at least were victims of this maniac before he finally went the whole way. there was plenty of chance to prevent it.
so, yeah, it is apologetics for murderers. everyone who thinks its ok to punch someone is under suspicion when they do it for random, crazy reasons. there was a marketing campaign in australia years ago "one punch can kill" it's literally true. one slash on the right part of someone's body also can open a major blood vessel or artery that leads rapidly to bleeding out as well. even a punch can cause this in some cases though that's pretty rare unless they are a hulking monster like this case.
Refugees are often poor and live or work in dangerous neighborhoods. That's why Ukrainian refugees in Germany are less safe than German women.
I get it, you don’t think there is ANY possibility this is an op. That’s fine, I do.
This is Everyday America.
He definitely was drugged up, and not with recreational ones.
"Divide and conquer… that’s how fiat systems keep people from adopting Bitcoin together."
It is a fact they they experimented with mind control, not that they accomplished it. Not according to any evidence I've seen.
My point is that focusing the conversation like this never does anything to address actual problems. The most likely scenario is that he simply should have been in an institution sooner but wasn't because we don't do that anymore. Plenty of mentally ill people hold similar delusions. That doesn't make them true.
I see many cases like this and I'm not helping them or anyone else by indulging CIA delusions, even if I agree that the CIA is disgusting and should be abolished (I do).
Or he's just mentally ill.
I get it, you think there is no chance this is an op. That’s your right. I find the entire scenario suspicious and am not ruling it out. That’s my right. And that’s why I posted it.
I didn't say there was no chance. I just don't jump to the most complex answers every time a mentally ill person does something antisocial.
I use something called evidence and reason to guide me in my problem solving. What you're doing is almost always fruitless.
I also have no issue with you posting what you believe. I didn't mean to convey that.
If he's mentally ill, then we can safely discard whatever comes out of his vile mouth.
But I also think people have a right to see my opinion as someone who deals with this issue daily. Otherwise, what's the point of posting things publicly? To hear ourselves speak?
Insert any subject to keep the division. Race, religion, sexuality, political parties, guns…….
You can tell which npubs have personally dealt with violent, mentally-ill people and who hasn't.
I have seen some ish, in my private life, working at a hospital, riding on public transport.
I am not demonizing such people, but I also don't want them sitting behind me on the bus.
Unlike most of the people pretending like this was alien probes or Da Joos, or whatever, I don't have a car. A drug addict, from Syria, went ape-shit on a route I regularly ride on, just last month. Everyone like, Oh, it's racist to complain about this sort of thing, but HE WENT AFTER A SYRIAN FAMILY SITTING ON THE TRAIN AND TRIED TO BEAT THEIR HEADS IN WITH A HAMMER AND AN AX.
BR24
Nach Attacke in ICE: Ermittlungen wegen zweifachen Mordversuchs
Nach der Attacke auf Passagiere in einem ICE in Niederbayern ermittelt die Staatsanwaltschaft gegen den Tatverdächtigen wegen zweifachen Mordversu...
Perfect example of someone responding emotionally with something totally tangential and not remotely relevant to the OP which claims NOTHING about whether he should be locked up (obviously) or criminals should be free to ride public transport (obviously not). Just an annoying af feature of social media that people free associate with what you post and choose their own adventure.
Did he say what government?
Iryna Zarutska decided on her own to sit right in front of him. How could he have known that she was going to sit there if it was premeditated?
My opinion:
- her murder was unexpected
- it starts to awaken people on the great replacement, insecurities from illegal immigration and white culture destruction
- MSMs try to hide the news and its consequences (potential “White Lives Matter” movement)
- Charlie Kirk seems to be the ideal candidate to lead this movement (he started on his X account before he died)
- the killer seems to be a professional
- now that he is dead it has replaced the murder of Iryna Zarutska on people's mind and emotions
If this is sort of true they are very fast and effective at keeping the mass dormant and manipulating their emotions
Now the momentum is gone
"ignore her, she's just too emotional to handle this topic in a sensible manner"
-- Person who claims public transit crazy has been implanted and brainwashed by an intelligence agency
I think martyring Kirk will only help the conservative cause.
—Its not a price I’d have paid to accomplish it but I feel confident that this didn’t help the shitlib movement.
I also think the deep state did this and it’s not left/right motivated.
This is similar to 9/11 and other high profile assassinations.
"Cui bono?" is a Latin phrase that translates to "to whom is it a benefit?" or more commonly in English, "who benefits?"
It's often used as a principle in investigations, debates, or critical thinking to suggest that the person or party who stands to gain the most from an action is likely responsible for it.
For example:
9/11
Who benefited? Muslims? I think not. Who benefited from making the entire world hate muslims?
It’s obvious when you take a moment.
🧡👊🏻🍻
You have to trust your instincts, they are designed to keep you safe.
Jab jab
