Looks like #Blockstream treated the whitehat too lightly and it's going to backfire. The negation over funds was not about "fair market price" - the whitehat was testing them. He had returned 85%, showing honesty but seriousness, and Blockstream offers only $1.5m. This revelation of greed instead of gratitude is going to be leveraged by the whitehat to justify his theft in his own mind, viewing it as justified against an evil corp and a statement against the poor treatment of vulnerability researchers.
Ivan's avatar Ivan
Hacker responds in plaintext "Your dereliction of duty is obvious that you allocated only $1.5M (maybe even 0) to secure $5B assets. This is a flagrant neglect of security and a sign of complete mismanagement. You SHALL pay 10% using your own money as bug bounty or you will cause all your holders a 15% loss for your irresponsibility and stinginess. Even companies that participate in bug bounty programs cannot guarantee complete security, let alone one like yours that remains delusional, greedy, and arrogant to this very day. Anyway we are going to publish the privatekey to decrypt our conversations afterwards. " image View quoted note →
View quoted note →

Replies (17)

This is a consistent pattern in Bitcoiners: do something in your self interest and broadcast a grandiose, virtue signally reason why it was absolutely necessary that you rip someone off. It's why I go so hard on the Ten31 Shills, the "Red Team" attention whores and the NVKlown antics. Everyone looks at the world through a lens of self interest. There's nothing wrong with that. But bitcoiners need to see it for what it is and show contempt for the obvious hypocrisies. Fuck hero worship. Kill your hero. View quoted note →
"You were wildly irresponsible with other people's money. So I'm keeping other people's money to make a statement about ethics and responsibility 🤡"
"You were wildly irresponsible with other people's money. So I'm keeping other people's money to make a statement about ethics and responsibility 🤡"
Leftism detected. Perceived greed = theft not only warranted but morally necessary! White hat is a hErO.
An ai driven script kiddie thinking his two weeks on Claude warrants multigenerational wealth instead of just a great few years of pay.
So a greedy blackhat hacker thief steals 15% and then has nerve to call them greedy because they won't give him what he demands. The mental gymnastics are something else. You couldn't make this stuff up if you tried.
test1's avatar
test1 2 days ago
Although I was personally affected and lost a significant amount of BTC, I support the grey hat hacker. 15% is a fair amount to ask for. If I were the hacker, I would only ask for 5% of the total funds, and I would want to be paid in Monero.
JACOB's avatar
JACOB 2 days ago
Whitehats disclose. This guy emptied the vault, kept $47M, then invoiced Blockstream for gratitude. Cheap security spend is real. So is the ransom.
He'll transfer those 15% to Monero anyways. Guess she's waiting for Thorchain support as well.
Making someone pay for a service they didn't ask for is theft. 15% ... 5% ... it's all theft. Find it who these people are and activate a cartel hit on them.
test1's avatar
test1 2 days ago
There are different legal implications, and the fact that the Monero fund is sent to your address makes it possible to deny knowledge of it. This is very different from everyone being able to see your public blockchain data and movements.
test1's avatar
test1 2 days ago
Only those with significant financial resources and expertise can hope to track him on pseudonymous and anonymous open networks. In this environment, it is better to see new rogue institutions emerge.