Thread - Nostr Hypermedia

I dont understand the argument that Bitcoin is captured. If bip-110 had 15% nodes of the network forcing soft fork on mining pool and the rest was not runing nodes that where forcing bip-110. How is that showing that, bitcoin is captured by centelized mining pools who decide what for get green light? If 85% of the Network didnt run bip-110 it seems to me like consensus working the way it was designed. Plese explain me if my understanding is not correct.

↑ Parent

Replies (4)

Tauri | Bitcoin BLAKE2b tauri@mynostr.com 1 week ago

I hope this helps you understand: View quoted note →

GuyFawkes GuyFawkes@primal.net 3 days ago

We can explain it to you, but we can understand it for you.

1 replies ↓

OceanSlim oceanslim@happytavern.oslim.dev 3 days ago

"I'm wrong but I can't admit it"

mleku me@mleku.dev yesterday

blockstream controls the majority of bitcoin core devs. surprisingly, bitcoin core devs promote policies that blockstream favors. and saylor and a whole cadre of influencoors strangely also promote the same positions. you could accuse conspiracy theory bout you could also just say that they know who butters their bread. not the plebs running the nodes, and not the hodlers. does that sound like peer to peer cash to you?