Weather agencies are unable to predict when a natural disaster will occur or even what the weather will be like tomorrow, but they are clear about climate change and what will happen in 100 years.
The same applies to governments: they are unable to stop any natural disaster or even provide aid after the fact, whether it be a fire, flood, flash flood, earthquake, etc., but they will be able to stop climate change, which is a global phenomenon 🤔.
Do you know what Boolean logic is? The texts of the ancient philosophers adhered to it strictly. You could agree or disagree, but their discourse was coherent. What we have now is a joke, and even worse are the fools who believe it.
Replies (4)
If climate change is real, the solution is localism.
If climate change is a hoax, the solution is localism.
Localism is the way.
This is not an attempt at boolean logic. I got lost on the equivalencies with traditional algebra.
They also consistently got it 'wrong' when it came to the alarmist climate prediction, for 50 years! AND people still buy it today.
It’s quite clear at this point that climate change is to impoverish from high energy prices, deindustrialize which causes job losses, destroy farms and eventually make those who survive starvation or suicide forever slaves.
They're basically saying "If we continue to emit as we've done, things will become less cozy than they're now", right?
I'm not claiming that everything "they're" saying is true.
But your rebuttal is just not valid.
It's like saying: "They pretend to be able to predict the overall temperature of this gas in this cylinder which gets heated up locally by a coil. And yet they can't even accurately predict the local flow and temperature in the short term." Not a valid critique.
If their claim, that the atmosphere is overall getting warmer, is true, then it's quite reasonable to assume the the frequency and severity of weather extremes is going to increase.
And no, accurate weather forecasting is not a prerequisite to come to this conclusion.
