Let's see:
All Bitcoin developers or people close to Bitcoin who appear in Epstein's papers:
- Have contributed to legitimizing chain spam and attempting to erase the essence of Bitcoin, which is peer-to-peer money transfer.
- Have contributed to the development and adoption of stablecoins.
- Have contributed to creating shitcoins or creating chains that support shitcoins.
Don't give me that crap, you're defending the indefensible, many of you are fucking bootlickers.
Replies (10)
Seems pretty damning. Quite high probability too. You got attestations or would it be easier for me to go Google?
I could go through them one by one, but the most relevant case is Blockstream. Clearly, all of its developers support spam, and Liquid, from being a Bitcoin sidechain, has transformed into a chain that supports stablecoins and shitcoins.
I realize this is a serious issue. I just had to relieve it with some humor imagining those guys like this.
Thank you for your reporting, Cypher. 🤜🤛
Which persons are involved?
So far I’ve seen Adam Back, Matt Corallo, Bryan Bishop, Vladimir van der Laan, Gavin Andresen. There are probably more.
woundn't even show in my timeline/been fading notes like this for years now/nostr
