Why is there so much fear for something so simple and obvious that is everybody's first thought when they read NIP-01 but in 5 years nobody tried once?
Login to reply
Replies (5)
BC people project that others are as poor as they are
Mainly because the fees will bite the users if this gets traction. If this succeeds, it will fail ๐
Does it support the zap protocol natively? e.g. when you send the onchain transaction, does it also blast nostr event? Will this fail for the users that currently already have lightning address set from a provider that doesn't have solution for onchain? What about using Silent Payments to make the onchain footprint private?
Silent payments would make this better, though, I still dislike this for the fees and microtransactions arguments, but the counter argument there is don't be cheap.
Don't worry, nobody is going to use it.
This is so funny and true.
View quoted note โ