You're describing Callback's features as if they're bugs.
This is a digital minimalist Linux phone by design that respects user privacy.
No browser. No social feeds. Curated apps. APK sideloading support. That's the point.
WhatsApp can be removed in a couple of clicks. The browser is intentionally blocked. Social feeds and email are intentionally blocked. The device is intentionally designed to reduce distraction and screen addiction.
If your goal is a $30 flip phone, buy a $30 flip phone.
If your goal is a privacy-focused Linux device that helps you step away from infinite scroll, doomscrolling, and algorithmic feeds, while supporting Commodore's community-supported licensing model and carrying forward the Commodore legacy, that's what Callback is.
You're criticizing it for being exactly what it was designed to be.
From the FAQ:
-
-
-
-
- 
View quoted note →
-
-
-
-
- 
I think that's a fair criticism if the goal is to build a general-purpose smartphone.
But that's not what Commodore is trying to do.
The C64 Ultimate has Wi-Fi, networking, FTP, BBS access, and online services, yet intentionally omits a browser. The Callback follows the same philosophy.
At the same time, Commodore OS Vision exists. It's a Debian-based Commodore Linux distro you can install on a modern PC, and it gives you the option to install a browser or not.
It's actually very cool. You should check it out.
To me, this seems less about maximizing access to the modern web and more about encouraging a different relationship with technology and online communities.
You may disagree with that decision, but I don't see it as a flaw. I see it as a deliberate design choice. The limitation is the feature.