He posted a note saying "Look I can trend on Primal at will", then created a bot that reposted, liked, and zapped that note 200k times with different keypairs. Seems kinda spammy, don't you think?
All we did was put him on the "can't trend" list, which is publicly available in our repo. 🤷♂️
View quoted note →
Login to reply
Replies (22)
Wasn’t referring to @semisol
Nostr is still very much a sandbox.
Less talkie more codie.
Please. 😂
Y'all be losing your shit over Primal this morning, but I'm with @miljan on this one.
View quoted note →
I for one would vote for @miljan and his buds to focus instead on making the Reply button work.
In nested replies.
Yes, but if he can do it anyone can do it, right? Isn't this more just pointing out a flaw than spamming?
I agree with you that every client can handle this stuff however they want, but manually adding non-bots to a list also seems kinda scammy, no?
Spamming nostr hurts everyone in nostr. Spam nostr's competitors if you want spam.
I know that is your client and you can do whatever you want , but these algorithms, trending stuff..etc are a bad ideea imo. With this shadowban is just a matter of time you'll end up just like X.
nostr is freedom.
1. freedom for user to post.
2. but also freedom for relays to decide whats the best for other user, without compromising on rule no. 1.
you did right.
Before you take what @semisol is saying about Primal at face value, consider the possibility that he is not acting in good faith.
All this talk about “censorship” and “shadowbanning” is nonsense. At Primal we do everything in the open. Our entire stack is FOSS. Our system is not perfect, but we continue to improve it every day.
View quoted note →
It also points out how unreliable zap trending feeds are unless they are web-of-trust scoped. An important point which makes centralized zap feeds difficult to manage.
And the shadowbans of @ralf and others? Banning a spammer is fine but thats not the concern here.
The problem seems to be the bug that he can trend on Primal at will. Don’t think the problem is the person who found the bug.
We should keep in mind that we’re building decentralized software here.
How can he do that ?
or just don’t count boosts more than once from a single pubkey?
Wait you boosted ralf and then that got *him* banned? Just trying to figure the logic out here.
Will he remain on that "can't trend list" forever as a punishment? What are the exact guidelines? If I zap you 20 times on your post, will you also get a shadowban?
Let relays handle that. Or people.
A client is just a window into Nostr.
that's exactly what it was indeed
What about LightX he is active in the community and Zaps users and Devs all the time!?
Couldn’t people just do that to people they don’t like? And have you think they were spammy #freeralf
If you are making a client are you "free" to do it however you want?