Unless Iโ€™m mistaken, John was referring to daddy government when comparing to devs; so over reaching devs. Iโ€™m not sure he called you gay ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿพ

Replies (16)

It is a condescending ad hominem that I met with a condescending ad hominem. Not only is it a ridiculous point but it is a weasel move. I challenged a boxing match cuz some of yall are too comfortable behind a keyboard. Back to the point: If a dev patches a vulnerable wallet you are using do you refer to that as Daddy Dev saving you? Or is that them just doing the job? Lol
Iโ€™m not sure about your first paragraph. He didnโ€™t insult you. He said devs were over reaching. I try to stay respectful with most. Some exceptions though. I dont see this particular situation as non respectful. For me at least I think the point was about freezing coins that could be โ€œtaintedโ€. We have for the first time, a real private property with bitcoin. If we let someone freeze it, then itโ€™s not ours. No private property. Thatโ€™s my take on this subject.
โ†‘