I’m not sure about your first paragraph. He didn’t insult you. He said devs were over reaching. I try to stay respectful with most. Some exceptions though. I dont see this particular situation as non respectful. For me at least I think the point was about freezing coins that could be “tainted”. We have for the first time, a real private property with bitcoin. If we let someone freeze it, then it’s not ours. No private property. That’s my take on this subject.

Replies (4)

Ya theres a whole history I will not get into. Just the fact that he chose to repost a response of someone calling me gay warrior after I stopped replying for ten hours shows what I am talking about. High school girl type of bullying tactics. Ya I started this thread saying I am ambivalent on the topic and I see the steelman of both sides. At what point is it a security patch and at what point is it interfering with ownership guarantees? That is the question at hand.
Ethereum does these types of security patches/rollbacks. We don’t need this with bitcoin
Gentlemen, gentlemen, there's no fighting. Let's all just move on and forget this happened. Seemed like y'all started off on the right foot, arguing reasonably, and somewhere it went off the rails. It happens online sometimes to all of us. PV <3